CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesEmotions and Moral BehaviorOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

They stoop to conquer: Guiding and self-regulatory functions of physical posture after success and failure.

Riskind, John H.·1984·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.479
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Three experiments tested the hypothesis that slumped (depressed) or upright physical postures are not just passive indicators of mental states but can reciprocally affect the mental states and behavior of an individual. By using a methodology similar to that in many facial manipulation studies, the experimenters changed subjects' postures in a standard learned helplessness setting. The results suggested that when a slumped posture is inappropriate to the current situation (a subject has just succeeded), the slumping seems to undermine subsequent motivation as well as feelings of control. But when appropriate (a subject has experienced failure or helplessness), slumping minimizes both feelings of helplessness and depression and motivation deficits. These results were interpreted with a new theoretical analysis, the appropriateness hypothesis. A slumped versus upright posture orientation can guide and moderate information-processing and responses to positive and negative mood-relevant stimuli. The implications of these findings are discussed with regard to self-regulatory processes that may operate in emotion, depression, and learned helplessness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.479

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Related

Metadata

Authors
Riskind, J. H.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Riskind, John H.
ORCID
Riskind, John H.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1984-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
479-493
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.479
OpenAlex
W2058718604
Cited by
178
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
posture, upright posture, learned helplessness, self-regulation, motivation, perceived control, depression, mood, emotion regulation, success and failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review