Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect.

Ed Diener, Randy J. Larsen, Steven Levine, Robert A. Emmons·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Research on emotions and several happiness scales suggest that positive and negative affect are strongly inversely correlated. However, work on subjective well-being indicates that over time, positive and negative affect are independent across persons. In order to reconcile this inconsistency, two dimensions are proposed for personal affective structure: the frequency of positive versus negative affect and the intensity of affect. Subjects in three studies completed daily and momentary reports on their moods. In support of the intensity dimension, the correlations between positive and negative intensity were strong and positive in all three studies. The intensities of specific emotions across persons were also highly correlated. Across the three studies the frequency and intensity of affect varied independently. Although average levels of positive and negative affect showed low correlations, this relation became strongly inverse when intensity was partialed out. Thus the intensity dimension helps explain the relative independence of positive and negative affect. In addition, emotional intensity is offered as a new personality dimension that manifests interesting characteristics.

Cites (4)

  1. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
    Rosenberg, Morris · 1965
  2. A circumplex model of affect.
    Russell, James A. · 1980 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.
    Epstein, Seymour · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. The Measurement of Happiness: Development of the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH)
    Kozma, A., Stones, M. J. · 1980 · Journal of Gerontology

Show all 4 references

Cited by (46)

  1. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.
    Ryff, Carol D. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Subjective well-being.
    Diener, Ed · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. The structure of psychological well-being revisited.
    Ryff, Carol D., Keyes, Corey Lee M. · 1995 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Bad Is Stronger Than Good
    Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin, Vohs, Kathleen D. · 2001 · Review of General Psychology
  5. The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
    Lyubomirsky, Sonja, King, Laura, Diener, Ed · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 742

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1253
The paper
Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1253

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.