Cited by 158Obesity and Health PracticesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Physicians' use of the 5As in counseling obese patients: is the quality of counseling associated with patients' motivation and intention to lose weight?

Open access
Jay, Melanie, Gillespie, Colleen, Schlair, Sheira, Sherman, Scott, Kalet, Adina·2010·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians are encouraged to counsel obese patients to lose weight, but studies measuring the quality of physicians' counseling are rare. We sought to describe the quality of physicians' obesity counseling and to determine associations between the quality of counseling and obese patients' motivation and intentions to lose weight, key predictors of behavior change. METHODS: We conducted post-visit surveys with obese patients to assess physician's use of 5As counseling techniques and the overall patient-centeredness of the physician.. Patients also reported on their motivation to lose weight and their intentions to eat healthier and exercise. One-way ANOVAs were used to describe mean differences in number of counseling practices across levels of self-rated intention and motivation. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess associations between number of 5As counseling practices used and patient intention and motivation. RESULTS: 137 patients of 23 physicians were included in the analysis. While 85% of the patients were counseled about obesity, physicians used only a mean of 5.3 (SD = 4.6) of 18 possible 5As counseling practices. Patients with higher levels of motivation and intentions reported receiving more 5As counseling techniques than those with lower levels. Each additional counseling practice was associated with higher odds of being motivated to lose weight (OR 1.31, CI 1.11-1.55), intending to eat better (OR 1.23, CI 1.06-1.44), and intending to exercise regularly (OR 1.14, CI 1.00-1.31). Patient centeredness of the physician was also positively associated with intentions to eat better (OR 2.96, CI 1.03-8.47) and exercise (OR 26.07, CI 3.70-83.93). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of physician counseling (as measured using the 5As counseling framework and patient-centeredness scales) was associated with motivation to lose weight and intentions to change behavior. Future studies should determine whether higher quality obesity counseling leads to improved behavioral and weight outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-10-159

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each additional counseling step is associated with increased patient motivation to lose weight (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.11-1.55).

    “each additional counseling step is associated with increased patient motivation to lose weight (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.55).35”

    From Obesity Management in Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [35]

  • For both obesity and smoking, a majority of providers now perform the first 2 A's: Assess the risk behavior and advise behavior change.

    “However, progress has been made, and for both obesity and smoking, a majority of providers now perform the first 2 A’s: Assess the risk behavior and advise behavior change.46–48”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jay, M., Gillespie, C., Schlair, S., Sherman, S., & Kalet, A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Montefiore Medical Center (US)
  • VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Jay, Melanie
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2010-06-09
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
159-159
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007650959
Cited by
158
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
23.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CD000146-03)
  • Health Resources and Services Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity counseling, patient-centeredness, weight loss motivation, weight loss intentions, healthy eating intentions, exercise intention, behavior change, physician-patient communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Motivation, New York City, Obesity, Patients, Physician-Patient Relations, Weight Loss, Health Care Surveys, Intention, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review