On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity.

Snyder, Mark, Gangestad, Steve·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

An extensive network of empirical relations has been identified in research on the psychological construct of self-monitoring. Nevertheless, in recent years some concerns have been expressed about the instrument used for the assessment of self-monitoring propensities, the Self-Monitoring Scale. Both the extent to which the measure taps an interpretable and meaningful causal variable and the extent to which the self-monitoring construct provides an appropriate theoretical understanding of this causal variable have been questioned. An examination of reanalyses of studies of self-monitoring, analyses of the internal structure of the Self-Monitoring Scale, and further relevant data suggest that the measure does tap a meaningful and interpretable causal variable with pervasive influences on social behavior, a variable reflected as a general self-monitoring factor. We discuss the evaluation and furthering of the interpretation of this latent causal variable, offer criteria for evaluating alternative measures of self-monitoring, and present a new, 18-item Self-Monitoring Scale.

Cites (3)

  1. Construct validity in psychological tests.
    Cronbach, Lee J., Meehl, Paul E. · 1955 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
    Lakatos, I. · 1970 · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
  3. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
    LAKATOS, IMRE · 2014 · Philosophy, Science, and History

Show all 3 references

Cited by (30)

  1. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
    Brown, Kirk Warren, Ryan, Richard M. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
    Triandis, Harry C. · 1989 · Psychological Review
  3. Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context
    Bandura, Albert · 2002 · Applied Psychology
  4. Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes
    Ilies, Remus, Morgeson, Frederick P., Nahrgang, Jennifer D. · 2005 · The Leadership Quarterly
  5. Reinforcement Learning Signal Predicts Social Conformity
    Klucharev, Vasily, Hytönen, Kaisa, Rijpkema, Mark, Smidts, Ale, Fernández, Guillén · 2009 · Neuron

See all 1,066

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.51.1.125
The paper
Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.1.125

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.