On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity.
Abstract
An extensive network of empirical relations has been identified in research on the psychological construct of self-monitoring. Nevertheless, in recent years some concerns have been expressed about the instrument used for the assessment of self-monitoring propensities, the Self-Monitoring Scale. Both the extent to which the measure taps an interpretable and meaningful causal variable and the extent to which the self-monitoring construct provides an appropriate theoretical understanding of this causal variable have been questioned. An examination of reanalyses of studies of self-monitoring, analyses of the internal structure of the Self-Monitoring Scale, and further relevant data suggest that the measure does tap a meaningful and interpretable causal variable with pervasive influences on social behavior, a variable reflected as a general self-monitoring factor. We discuss the evaluation and furthering of the interpretation of this latent causal variable, offer criteria for evaluating alternative measures of self-monitoring, and present a new, 18-item Self-Monitoring Scale.
Cites (3)
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Cronbach, Lee J., Meehl, Paul E. · 1955 · Psychological Bulletin
- Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research ProgrammesLakatos, I. · 1970 · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
- Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research ProgrammesLAKATOS, IMRE · 2014 · Philosophy, Science, and History
Cited by (30)
- The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-beingBrown, Kirk Warren, Ryan, Richard M. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.Triandis, Harry C. · 1989 · Psychological Review
- Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural ContextBandura, Albert · 2002 · Applied Psychology
- Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomesIlies, Remus, Morgeson, Frederick P., Nahrgang, Jennifer D. · 2005 · The Leadership Quarterly
- Reinforcement Learning Signal Predicts Social ConformityKlucharev, Vasily, Hytönen, Kaisa, Rijpkema, Mark, Smidts, Ale, Fernández, Guillén · 2009 · Neuron
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.51.1.125
- The paper
- Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.1.125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.