Cited by 1,268Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in OrganizationsEmployee Performance and Leadership

Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes

Ilies, Remus, Morgeson, Frederick P., Nahrgang, Jennifer D.·2005·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leadership is an increasingly acknowledged factor for follower well-being.

    “Moreover, leadership is an increasingly acknowledged factor for follower well-being (Ilies et al. 2005).”
  • Ilies et al. (2005) wrote that authentic leadership manifests in the authentic leader's eudaimonia, such that they realize who they truly are by expressing who they truly are.

    “Concurrently, Ilies et al. (2005) wrote that authentic leadership manifests in the authentic leader's eudaimonia, such that they realize who they truly are by expressing who they truly are.”
  • When leaders display unbiased processing of self-relevant information, personal integrity, and an authentic relational orientation, leader-follower relationships will be characterized by high levels of respect, positive affect, and trust.

    “they argue that when leaders display unbiased processing of self-relevant information, personal integrity, and an authentic relational orientation, leader-follower relationships will be characterized by high levels of respect, positive affect, and trust.”
  • Such reciprocity results in greater authenticity and wellbeing among followers.

    “Such reciprocity is posited to result in greater authenticity, and wellbeing, among followers.”
  • Positive modeling of the components of authenticity is a primary mechanism whereby authentic leaders influence and develop their followers.

    “positive modeling of the various components of authenticity including self-awareness, self-regulatory processes, positive psychological states, and/or a positive moral perspective has been consistently identified as a primary mechanism whereby authentic leaders influence and develop their followers”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
373-394
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139687967
Cited by
1,268
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 51
FWCI
30.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
authentic leadership, eudaimonic well-being, leader authenticity, self-awareness, hedonism, eudaimonia, leader development, antecedents of leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review