Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.
Abstract
We conducted four experiments to investigate free riding, evaluation apprehension, and production blocking as explanations of the difference in brainstorming productivity typically observed between real and nominal groups. In Experiment 1, we manipulated assessment expectations in group and individual brainstorming. Although productivity was higher when subjects worked under personal rather than collective assessment instructions, type of session still had a major impact on brainstorm-ing productivity under conditions that eliminated the temptation to free ride. Experiment 2 demon-strated that inducing evaluation apprehension reduced productivity in individual brainstorming. However, the failure to find an interaction between evaluation apprehension and type of session in Experiment 3 raises doubts about evaluation apprehension as a major explanation of the productiv-ity loss in brainstorming groups. Finally, by manipulating blocking directly, we determined in Exper-iment 4 that production blocking accounted for most of the productivity loss of real brainstorming groups. The processes underlying production blocking are discussed, and a motivational interpreta-tion of blocking is offered. In his influential book, Osborn (1957) suggested brainstorm-ing as a method of group problem solving that considerably in-
Cited by (35)
- Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity ResearchPlucker, Jonathan A., Beghetto, Ronald A., Dow, Gayle T. · 2004 · Educational Psychologist
- The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.Hinsz, Verlin B., Tindale, R. Scott, Vollrath, David A. · 1997 · Psychological Bulletin
- Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small GroupsMcLeod, Poppy Lauretta, Lobel, Sharon Alisa, Cox, Taylor H. · 1996 · Small Group Research
- Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated GroupsConnolly, Terry, Jessup, Leonard M., Valacich, Joseph S. · 1990 · Management Science
- Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision MakingDe Dreu, Carsten K. W., Nijstad, Bernard A., van Knippenberg, Daan · 2008 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.497
- The paper
- Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.