The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of daily stress on health and mood: psychological and social resources as mediators
Abstract
This study examined daily stress processes among 75 married couples across 20 assessments during a 6-month period. The somatic and psychological effects of common everyday hassles were investigated. Overall, there was a significant relationship between daily stress and the occurrence of both concurrent and subsequent health problems such as flu, sore throat, headaches, and backaches. The relationship of daily stress to mood disturbance was more complex. The negative effects of stress on mood were limited to a single day, with the following day characterized by mood scores that were better than usual. Furthermore, striking individual differences were found in the extent to which daily stress was associated with health and mood across time. Participants with unsupportive social relationships and low self-esteem were more likely to experience an increase in psychological and somatic problems both on and following stressful days than were participants high in self-esteem and social support. These data suggest that persons with low psychosocial resources are vulnerable to illness and mood disturbance when their stress levels increase, even if they generally have little stress in their lives.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Conversely, high selfesteem tends to be strongly associated with internal locus of control, or the confident perception that one's outcomes are determined by one's actions (DeLongis et al., 1988;Lo, 2002;Petrie and Rotheram, 1982;Whisman and Kwon, 1993).”
From Self-esteem, locus of control, hippocampal volume, and cortisol regulation in young and old adulthood (2005) · cites this paper as DeLongis et al., 1988
In the citing paper
“Low self-esteem is associated with greater amounts of perceived daily hassles and chronic stressors, even after correcting for environmental factors, occupation, age, and gender.”
From Self-esteem, locus of control, hippocampal volume, and cortisol regulation in young and old adulthood (2005) · cites this paper as DeLongis et al., 1988
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,013 of 1,013
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2018) · Journal of Social Science · doi:10.16881/jss.2018.07.29.3.3
Video Game Reward Types and The Player Experience
Phillips, C. J. (2018) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.119100
Yun, I., & Kweon, H. (2019) · 한국심리학회지: 일반 · doi:10.22257/kjp.2019.3.38.1.103
Kang, S. K., Choi, Y. J., & Park, S. B. (2019) · Korean Journal of Stress Research · doi:10.17547/kjsr.2019.27.1.132
“이 척도는 DeLongis et al.(1988)의 연구를 바탕으로 Kim JH(1995)가 일반적 생활에서 발생하는 문제중심의 일상 스트레스 척도 (Daily Hassles Scale, DHS)를 번안하여 국내 환경에 맞추 어 수정ㆍ보완하여 리커트 5점 척도의 총 16문항으로 재구 성한 것이다.”
Kulik, L., & Liberman, G. (2019) · Sexual and Relationship Therapy · doi:10.1080/14681994.2019.1599105 · Cited by 1
The Amount of Daily Stress of Diseases of Otolaryngology
Chung, D. H., Seo, M. K., Kang, H. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.35420/jcohns.2011.22.1.65
Gallagher, M. S. (2012) · FHSU Scholars Repository (Fort Hays State University) · doi:10.58809/wpcw2771 · Cited by 1
“Some of the more popular measurements include the Social Adjustment Rating Scale (Holmes & Rahe, 1967), the Life Events and Difficulties Schedule (Brown & Harris, 1978), and the Hassles and Uplifts Scale (DeLongis, Folkman & Lazarus, 1988).”
BackgroundThe Effects of Coping, Self-Esteem, and Social Support on Stress and Wellbeing
Meyerhoffer-Kubalik, E. (2013) · doi:10.58809/bcez7349
“DeLongis, Folkman, and Lazarus (1988) studied the individual and social resources that mediate the relationship between daily stress on mood and physical health in 75 married couples.”
Backgroundأحمد, د. س. ع. ع. ا. أ. د. س. ع. ع. ا. (2020) · Journal of King Abdulaziz University Arts and Humanities · doi:10.4197/art.28-14.11
GENERAL WELL BEING AND COPING DURING LOCKDOWN IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Kaushik, S., & Gupta, C. K. (2020) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH · doi:10.36106/ijsr/5240984
Hart (1991) · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:4
Metadata
- Authors
- DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- DeLongis, Anita
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 486-495
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2062086084
- Cited by
- 1,621
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 67
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA02976)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- daily stress, married couples, somatic symptoms, mood disturbance, self-esteem, social support, psychosocial resources, individual differences, stress vulnerability
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Social Environment, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Mood Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review