Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect.

Abstract

Facial gestures have been given an increasingly critical role in models of emotion. The biological significance of interindividual transmission of emotional signals is a pivotal assumption for placing the face in a central position in these models. This assumption invited a logical corollary, examined in this article: Face-processing should be highly efficient. Three experiments documented an asymmetry in the processing of emotionally discrepant faces embedded in crowds. The results suggested that threatening faces pop out of crowds, perhaps as a result of a preattentive, parallel search for signals of direct threat.

Cites (2)

1. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
   Zajonc, R. B. · 1980 · American Psychologist
2. Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information.
   Bargh, John A. · 1982 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (61)

1. Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
   Rozin, Paul, Royzman, Edward B. · 2001 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
2. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.
   Bar-Haim, Yair, Lamy, Dominique, Pergamin, Lee, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. · 2007 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events – the mobilization minimization hypothesis.
   Taylor, Shelley E. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass.
   Öhman, Arne, Flykt, Anders, Esteves, Francisco · 2001 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
5. Emotion and Cognition: Insights from Studies of the Human Amygdala
   Phelps, Elizabeth A. · 2006 · Annual Review of Psychology

See all 1,262