The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attachment Style as a Predictor of Adult Romantic Relationships
Abstract
Questionnaire measures of attachment style, attachment history, beliefs about relationships, self-esteem, limerence, loving, love addiction, and love styles were administered to 374 undergraduates. Attachment style was related in theoretically expected ways to attachment history and to beliefs about relationships. Securely attached Ss reported relatively positive perceptions of their early family relationships. Avoidant Ss were most likely to report childhood separation from their mother and to express mistrust of others. Anxious-ambivalent subjects were less likely than avoidant Ss to see their father as supportive, and they reported a lack of independence and a desire for deep commitment in relationships. The self-esteem measure and each of the scales measuring forms of love were factor analyzed separately. Analyses based on scale scores derived from the resulting factors indicated that attachment style was also strongly related to self-esteem and to the various forms of love discussed in other theoretical frameworks. The results suggest that attachment theory offers a useful perspective on adult love relationships.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“secure individuals are comfortable with intimacy, avoidant individuals strive to minimise it and maintain distance, anxious individuals seek it excessively, and ambivalent individuals oscillate between desire and withdrawal (Bartholomew & Horowitz 1991;Feeney & Noller 1990;Spielmann et al. 2013).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Feeney & Noller 1990
In the citing paper
“Securely attached individuals, by contrast, may rely primarily on human partners (Feeney & Noller 1990) and may not convert loneliness into artificial intimacy at all, treating AI as supplemental tools rather than substitutive partners.”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Feeney & Noller 1990
In the citing paper
“secure individuals are comfortable with intimacy, avoidant individuals strive to minimise it and maintain distance, anxious individuals seek it excessively, and ambivalent individuals oscillate between desire and withdrawal (Bartholomew & Horowitz 1991;Feeney & Noller 1990;Spielmann et al. 2013).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Feeney & Noller 1990
In the citing paper
“This finding aligns with our hypotheses but inverts expectations from human attachment theory, which predicts greater intimacy among secure individuals and lower intimacy among avoidant individuals under conditions of loneliness (Ainsworth & Bowlby 1991;Feeney & Noller 1990).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Feeney & Noller 1990
In the citing paper
“secure individuals are comfortable with intimacy, avoidant individuals strive to minimise it and maintain distance, anxious individuals seek it excessively, and ambivalent individuals oscillate between desire and withdrawal (Bartholomew & Horowitz 1991;Feeney & Noller 1990;Spielmann et al. 2013).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Feeney & Noller 1990
In the citing paper
“Anxiously attached individuals seek reassurance but are sensitive to inconsistency (Feeney & Noller 1990), potentially fostering more volatile engagement.”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Feeney & Noller 1990
In the citing paper
“The literature commonly identifies four adult attachment styles: secure (low anxiety and avoidance), avoidant (emotional distancing and discomfort with intimacy), anxious (reassurance-seeking and fear of rejection), and ambivalent (a volatile combination of anxiety and avoidance, producing desire-withdrawal spirals) (Feeney & Noller 1990;Hazan & Shaver 1987).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Feeney & Noller 1990
In the citing paper
“secure individuals are comfortable with intimacy, avoidant individuals strive to minimise it and maintain distance, anxious individuals seek it excessively, and ambivalent individuals oscillate between desire and withdrawal (Bartholomew & Horowitz 1991;Feeney & Noller 1990;Spielmann et al. 2013).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Feeney & Noller 1990
Citations
Cites
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
Rever, G. W. (1972) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197211000-00011 · Cited by 8,446 · cited 2×
“text of intimate relationships; Bowlby (1973) suggested that working models of the self and of relationship partners tend to be complementary and mutually confirming.”
BackgroundResultSecurity in Infancy, Childhood, and Adulthood: A Move to the Level of Representation
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/3333827 · Cited by 4,567
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132 · Cited by 1,601
Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships
Simpson, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971 · Cited by 1,501
The Costly Pursuit of Self-Esteem
Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392 · Cited by 1,402
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60328-7 · Cited by 1,296
The existential function of close relationships: Introducing death into the science of love
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Hirschberger, G. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0701_2 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-291
- ISSN
- 1939-1315
- 0022-3514
- Cited by
- 707
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
