Cited by 44Attachment and Relationship DynamicsNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Women’s satisfaction with social support and their receipt of aid

Hobfoll, Stevan E., Shoham, Shelley B., Ritter, Christian·1991·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.332

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobfoll, S. E., Shoham, S. B., & Ritter, C.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1991-08
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
332-341
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2098855808
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
women, social support, social support satisfaction, welfare dependency, help-seeking, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review