Cited by 64Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Strivings for Romantic Intimacy Following Partner Complaint or Partner Criticism: A Terror Management Perspective

Hirschberger, Gilad, Florian, Victor, Mikulincer, Mario·2003·Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Abstract

The current study examines the effects of partner complaint and partner criticism on strivings for romantic intimacy from the perspective of terror management theory. One hundred and seventy-four Israeli undergraduate students were randomly assigned to either a mortality salience or control condition and were then asked to read a vignette in which they imagined themselves either receiving praise from their romantic partner, receiving a specific complaint from their partner, or being criticized by their partner. Following this procedure, all participants completed a scale assessing their strivings for intimacy with their romantic partner. The results indicated that under mortality nonsalient conditions strivings for intimacy were highest under conditions of praise, followed by conditions of complaint and were lowest under conditions of criticism. However, when mortality was made salient strivings of intimacy were equally high under all three feedback conditions. The results are discussed in light of the growing body of literature on the terror management functions of close relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02654075030205006

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mortality salience bolsters striving for romantic intimacy.

    “Indeed, studies have found that MS bolsters striving for romantic intimacy [41], enhances commitment to romantic relationships [42,43], and leads to endorsements of romantic and selfless relationship partners and styles of love [44].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirschberger, G., Florian, V., & Mikulincer, M.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Mikulincer, Mario
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2003-10
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
675-687
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W2072713966
Cited by
64
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
romantic intimacy, terror management theory, mortality salience, close relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review