Cited by 336Social and Intergroup PsychologyPolitical Conflict and GovernanceDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987

Doty, Richard M., Peterson, Bill E., Winter, David G.·1991·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.629

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 336

Metadata

Authors
Doty, R. M., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1991
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
629-640
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4246222485
Cited by
329
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
authoritarianism, threat perception, political attitudes, authoritarian personality, American politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review