The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one’s worldview?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In an early study, Greenberg et al. (1992) provided initial support for this idea by showing that activating the concept of tolerance reduced the tendency to devaluate different others after MS.”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Greenberg et al., 1992
In the citing paper
“whereas American conservatives derogated a politically dissimilar person after MS, liberals did not (Study 1).”
From When Death is Good for Life: Considering the Positive Trajectories of Terror Management (2012) · cites this paper as Greenberg, Simon, Pyszczynski, Solomon, and Chatel, 1992
In the citing paper
“a second study found that priming the value of tolerance reduced derogatory worldview defenses that were otherwise observed after MS.”
From When Death is Good for Life: Considering the Positive Trajectories of Terror Management (2012) · cites this paper as Greenberg et al., 1992
In the citing paper
“Evidence supported that hypothesis, and a second study found that experimentally priming the value of tolerance eliminated derogatory worldview defenses that were otherwise observed after MS (see also [53]).”
From An Appreciative View of the Brighter Side of Terror Management Processes (2015) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“Evidence supported that hypothesis, and a second study found that experimentally priming the value of tolerance eliminated derogatory worldview defenses that were otherwise observed after MS (see also [53]).”
From An Appreciative View of the Brighter Side of Terror Management Processes (2015) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165 · Cited by 5,377
Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 · Cited by 2,125
“Some studies suggest that mortality salience increases prejudice, but only in people who are already predisposed toward the holding of prejudicial attitudes (Greenberg et al. 1992).”
BackgroundHewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109 · Cited by 2,031
The end of the end of ideology.
Jost, J. T. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.651 · Cited by 1,614
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Chatel, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 212-220
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4294945763
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Keywords
- terror management theory, mortality salience, tolerance, intergroup attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
