The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation.
Abstract
Alternative predictions about the influence of surveillance on intrinsic motivation were derived from cognitive evaluation and objective self-awareness theories. Adult Ss in Experiment 1 were assigned to surveillance conditions that implicated either controlling or noncontrolling surveillant intentions or to no-surveillance conditions. A behavioral measure revealed greater intrinsic motivation in the noncontrolling intention and no-surveillance conditions than in the controlling intention conditions (ps<.05). Experiment 2 examined why the lowest level of intrinsic motivation in Experiment 1 occurred when the surveillant did not specify a reason for watching Ss
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Surveillance has been shown to decrease self-determined motivation127.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [127]
In the citing paper
“Monitoring and quantifying worker behaviours might reduce autonomy because it is experienced as controlling and narrows goal focus to only quantifiable results127,180; there is some evidence that this is the case when algorithmic management systems are used to this end172,178,181.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [127]
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,406
(1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,635
Borich, G. D. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 318
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices
Ghoshal, S. (2005) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2005.16132558 · Cited by 3,852
TRUST AND DISTRUST IN ORGANIZATIONS: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions
Kramer, R. M. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569 · Cited by 3,415
Accounting for the effects of accountability.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255 · Cited by 2,383
Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161563 · Cited by 2,452
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4 · Cited by 1,044
Metadata
- Authors
- Enzle, M. E., & Anderson, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-266
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2060112242
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- surveillance, intrinsic motivation, cognitive evaluation theory, observer behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
