How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of this research is based on field surveys of individuals with personal experience of being affected by decisions, although controlled experiments involving simulated decision-making and scenario-based methods have also been used.
“Much of this research is based on field surveys of individuals with personal experience of being affected by decisions (e.g. [79]), although controlled experiments involving simulated decisionmaking and scenario-based methods have also been used [78].”
From 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions (2018) · cites this paper as [78]
Research on justice judgements in non-automated contexts has found that individuals pay more attention to other people's outcomes than to information about the procedure behind the decision that affects them.
“Research on justice judgements in non-automated contexts has found that individuals pay more attention to other people's outcomes than they do to information about the procedure behind the decision that affects them [78, 84].”
From 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions (2018) · cites this paper as [78]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942 · see citing works
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Self-citation'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions
Binns, R., Van Kleek, M., Veale, M., Lyngs, U., Zhao, J., & Shadbolt, N. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173951 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Culture's Impact on the Importance of Fairness in Interorganizational Relationships
Lund, D. J., Scheer, L. K., & Kozlenkova, I. V. (2013) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jim.13.0020 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions
Kim, T., Wang, J., Chen, T., Zhu, Y., & Sun, R. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21944 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M.
- ORCID
- Lind, E. Allan
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1034-1046
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4243800640
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 20.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- perceived fairness, outcome measurement, social comparison, fairness judgments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
