Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality.
Abstract
Lay dispositionism refers to lay people's tendency to use traits as the basic unit of analysis in social perception (L. Ross & R. E. Nisbett, 1991). Five studies explored the relation between the practices indicative of lay dispositionism and people's implicit theories about the nature of personal attributes. As predicted, compared with those who believed that personal attributes are malleable (incremental theorists), those who believed in fixed traits (entity theorists) used traits or trait-relevant information to make stronger future behavioral predictions (Studies 1 and 2) and made stronger trait inferences from behavior (Study 3). Moreover, the relation between implicit theories and lay dispositionism was found in both the United States (a more individualistic culture) and Hong Kong (a more collectivistic culture), suggesting this relation to be generalizable across cultures (Study 4). Finally, an experiment in which implicit theories were manipulated provided preliminary evidence for the possible causal role of implicit theories in lay dispositionism (Study 5).
Cites (3)
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesTversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
- A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Dweck, Carol S., Leggett, Ellen L. · 1988 · Psychological Review
- Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events.Morris, Michael W., Peng, Kaiping · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (26)
- Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an InterventionBlackwell, Lisa S, Trzesniewski, Kali H, Dweck, Carol Sorich · 2007 · Child Development
- Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be DevelopedYeager, David Scott, Dweck, Carol S. · 2012 · Educational Psychologist
- Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation.Burnette, Jeni L., O'Boyle, Ernest H., VanEpps, Eric M., Pollack, Jeffrey M., Finkel, Eli J. · 2013 · Psychological Bulletin
- The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism.Ames, Daniel R., Rose, Paul, Anderson, Cameron P. · 2006 · Journal of Research in Personality
- Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach.Hong, Ying-yi, Chiu, Chi-yue, Dweck, Carol S., Lin, Derrick M.-S., Wan, Wendy · 1999 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.19
- The paper
- Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.