CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 613Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPersonality Traits and PsychologyAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personality and well-being: reexamining methods and meanings

Schmutte, Pamela S., Ryff, Carol D.·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Because measures of personality and well-being share common affective underpinnings and items, previously reported links between these domains may be tautological. To explicate the connections between personality and well-being, 2 samples of midlife adults (N = 215 and N = 139) completed measures of personality (NEO Five Factor Inventory; P.T. Costa & R.R. McCrae, 1992) and psychological well-being (C. D. Ryff's, 1989b, Psychological Well-Being [PWB] inventory) that were maximally distinct, both conceptually and methodologically. Analyses included additional controls for source overlap, common affective underpinnings, and shared item content. Distinctive personality correlates were observed for the 6 PWB outcomes: self-acceptance, environmental mastery, and purpose in life were linked with Neuroticism (N) Extraversion (E) and Conscientiousness (C); personal growth was linked with Openness to Experience (O) and E; positive relations with others was linked with Agreeableness (A) and E; autonomy was linked with N. Psychological wellness and its personality correlates may be more complex than prior studies suggest.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 446

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
ORCID
Ryff, Carol D.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1997-09
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
549-559
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549
OpenAlex
W2090286781
Cited by
613
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 41
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
personality, psychological well-being, tautology, NEO-FFI, self-acceptance, environmental mastery, meaning of life, personal growth, positive relations with others, autonomy, middle-aged adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Assessment, Random Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review