Cited by 202Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMind wandering and attentionMemory Processes and Influences

Origins of ruminative thought: Trauma, incompleteness, nondisclosure, and suppression

Gold, Daniel B., Wegner, Daniel M.·1995·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss theories of the origin of ruminative thought. We begin by providing a working definition of rumination, separating rumination from other forms of cognitive activity and distinguishing ruminations from ordinary memories. Then, we review what we believe are the major categories of theory that attempt to account for the existence and nature of rumination. These include theories of traumatization, incompleteness, nondisclosure, and thought suppression. Ruminations may originate for a number of reasons, but it seems they may continue because of our attempts to control them. Evidence from studies on thought suppression suggests that the suppression of unwanted thoughts may in fact fuel the very emotions and thoughts we are trying to avoid. Thought suppression may set up a state in which we not only increase the amount we think about an unwanted thought, but potentially also sharpen our emotional reaction to those thoughts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02617.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cortical appraisal can lead to intentional suppression of emotional behavior or thoughts; this has been recognized as a counterproductive, although common, strategy, and involves a misuse of cortical executive networks to interfere in the spontaneous self-regulatory action of the subcortical centers.

    “Cortical appraisal can lead to intentional suppression of emotional behavior or thoughts (Gellhorn, 1969; Wegner et al., 1987; Gold and Wegner, 1995); this has been recognized as a counterproductive, although common, strategy, and involves a (mis-)use of cortical executive networks to interfere in the spontaneous self-regulatory action of the subcortical centers.”
  • Some types of avoidance strategies, such as distraction, can be beneficial with acute psychological and physical symptoms.

    “As noted previously, some types of avoidance strategies, such as distraction, can be beneficial with acute psychological and physical symptoms [27, 56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gold, D. B., & Wegner, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Wegner, Daniel M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-07
Volume
25
Issue
14
Pages
1245-1261
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W2065569180
Cited by
202
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
rumination, thought suppression, trauma, incompleteness, non-disclosure, intrusive thoughts, emotional reactivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review