CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,049Aging and Gerontology ResearchPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years.

Charles, Susan Turk, Reynolds, Chandra A., Gatz, Margaret·2001·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.136
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Positive and negative affect, measured by the Bradburn Affect Balance Scale, were studied in a longitudinal sample spanning from 1971 to 1994. The sample (N = 2,804) represented 4 generations of families. Linear trend analyses compared generations over time for positive and negative affect and also examined the possible influences of neuroticism and extraversion on initial levels of affect and patterns of change in affect. Negative affect decreased with age for all generations, although the rate was attenuated among the oldest adults. Higher neuroticism scores also attenuated the decrease in negative affect across time. For positive affect, the younger and middle-aged adults showed marked stability, but the older group evidenced a small decrease over time. Higher levels of extraversion were related to more stability in positive affect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.136

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Blazer, 1996, Mood disorders., 235
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.820 · DOI
  3. Eysenck, 1964, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory.
  4. Frenkel-Brunswik, 1968, Adjustments and reorientation in the course of the life span., 77
  5. 10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.590 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0882-7974.7.1.119 · DOI
  7. Levinson, 1978, The seasons of a man's life.
  8. Veenhoven, 1993, Happiness in nations.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–998 of 998

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Charles, S. T., Reynolds, C. A., & Gatz, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2001
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
136-151
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.136
OpenAlex
W2127613563
Cited by
1,049
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 60
FWCI
24.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r37ag007977-13)
  • National Institute on Aging (R37 AG-07977)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
positive affect, negative affect, age differences, longitudinal change, neuroticism, extraversion, generational differences, personality stability, aging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Quality of Life, Sex Factors, Intergenerational Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review