Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined.
Abstract
The authors predicted that derogation of group deviants depends on the extent to which in-group norms or values are validated or undermined in a social context. In Experiment 1 participants were less tolerant and derogated in-group deviants more when other in-group members opposed the norm. In Experiment 2 participants derogated in-group deviants more than out-group deviants and than noncategorized individuals, but only when normative in-group members lacked uniformity. In Experiment 3 participants derogated in-group deviants more when there was uncertainty about in-group superiority. These results are consistent with previous research on the black sheep effect (J. M. Marques, V. Y. Yzerbyt, & J. -P. Leyens, 1988) and with the model of subjective group dynamics (D. Abrams, J. M. Marques, N. J. Bown, & M. Henson, 2000; J. M. Marques, D. Abrams, D. Paez, & C. Martinez-Taboada, 1998).
Cites (6)
- Social psychology of intergroup relationsTajfel, H · 1982 · Annual Review of Psychology
- A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.Deutsch, Morton, Gerard, Harold B. · 1955 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human BehaviorCialdini, Robert B., Kallgren, Carl A., Reno, Raymond R. · 1991 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Social Pressures in Informal GroupsFestinger, Leon, Schachter, Stanley, Back, Kurt · 1950 · The American Catholic Sociological Review
- Deviation, rejection and communicationSchachter, Stanley · 1951 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social IdentityBranscombe, Nyla R., Wann, Daniel L, Noel, Jeffrey G., Coleman, Jason · 1993 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Cited by (9)
- Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group NormsHogg, Michael A., Reid, Scott A. · 2006 · Communication Theory
- Uncertainty–identity theoryHogg, Michael A. · 2007 · Advances in experimental social psychology
- How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: negative group members and dysfunctional groupsFelps, Will, Mitchell, Terence R., Byington, Eliza · 2006 · Research in Organizational Behavior
- The Red Sneakers Effect: Inferring Status and Competence from Signals of NonconformityBellezza, Silvia, Gino, Francesca, Keinan, Anat · 2014 · Journal of Consumer Research
- So Right It's Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision MakingBaron, Robert S. · 2005 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.436
- The paper
- Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.