Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice.
Abstract
Can people feel worse off as the options they face increase? The present studies suggest that some people--maximizers--can. Study 1 reported a Maximization Scale, which measures individual differences in desire to maximize. Seven samples revealed negative correlations between maximization and happiness, optimism, self-esteem, and life satisfaction, and positive correlations between maximization and depression, perfectionism, and regret. Study 2 found maximizers less satisfied than nonmaximizers (satisficers) with consumer decisions, and more likely to engage in social comparison. Study 3 found maximizers more adversely affected by upward social comparison. Study 4 found maximizers more sensitive to regret and less satisfied in an ultimatum bargaining game. The interaction between maximizing and choice is discussed in terms of regret, adaptation, and self-blame.
Cites (26)
- The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerationsBaron, Reuben M., Kenny, David A. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskKahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos · 1979 · Econometrica
- Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Watson, David, Clark, Lee Anna, Tellegen, Auke · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The satisfaction with life scaleDiener, Ed, Emmons, Robert A., Larsen, Randy J., Griffin, Sharon · 1985 · Journal of Personality Assessment
- Society and the Adolescent Self-ImageRosenberg, Morris · 1965
- A theory of social comparison processesFestinger, Leon · 1954 · Human Relations
- The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of ChoiceTversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1981 · Science
- Subjective well-being.Diener, Ed · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
- Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Abramson, Lyn Y., Seligman, Martin E., Teasdale, John D. · 1978 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Scheier, Michael F., Carver, Charles S. · 1985 · Health Psychology
Cited by (44)
- The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Lyubomirsky, Sonja, King, Laura, Diener, Ed · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
- Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical powerOppenheimer, Daniel M., Meyvis, Tom, Davidenko, Nicolas · 2009 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- The dynamics of proactivity at workGrant, Adam M., Ashford, Susan J. · 2008 · Research in Organizational Behavior
- Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice OverloadScheibehenne, Benjamin, Greifeneder, Rainer, Todd, Peter M. · 2010 · Journal of Consumer Research
- Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being.Lyubomirsky, Sonja · 2001 · American Psychologist
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1178
- The paper
- Schwartz, B. N., Ward, A. C., Monterosso, J. R., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.