Cited by 3,493Survey Methodology and NonresponsePsychometric Methodologies and TestingExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power

Open access
Oppenheimer, Daniel M., Meyvis, Tom, Davidenko, Nicolas·2009·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Oppenheimer, Daniel M.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
867-872
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152427206
Cited by
3,493
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 231 · 2025: 304 · 2024: 262 · 2023: 283 · 2022: 304 · 2021: 356 · 2020: 304 · 2019: 277 · 2018: 246 · 2017: 248 · 2016: 168 · 2015: 182 · 2014: 141 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 47
FWCI
92.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
participant compliance, satisficing, statistical power, reliability statistics, data validity, noisy data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review