Cited by 296Cultural Differences and ValuesAction Observation and SynchronizationSocial and Intergroup Psychology

It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals.

van Baaren, Rick B., Maddux, William W., Chartrand, Tanya L., de Bouter, Cris, van Knippenberg, Ad·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The present studies demonstrated the moderation of self-construal orientation on mimicry. Recent research has indicated that an interdependent self-construal is associated with assimilation of the other to the self whereas an independent self-construal is associated with minimizing the influence of others on the self (H. R. Markus & S. Kitayama, 1991; D. Stapel & W. Koomen, 2001). Therefore, the authors hypothesized that an interdependent self-construal would be associated with more mimicry than an independent self-construal. When self-construal orientations were experimentally primed, as in Studies 1 and 2, independent self-construals produced less nonconscious mimicry than interdependent self-construals. When self-construals were examined as cultural differences with either a chronically dominant independent (Americans) or interdependent (Japanese) construal of the self, these results were replicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants with a temporarily induced or chronic interdependent self-construal are more likely to match a confederate's behaviors than those with an independent self-construal.

    “Van Baaren and colleagues varied self construal orientation, and found that participants with either a temporarily induced, or chronic, dominant interdependent self construal were more likely to match the behaviors of a confederate than those with an independent self construal (van Baaren, Maddux, Chartrand, Bouter & van Knippenberg, 2003).”

    From Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation (2010) · cites this paper as van Baaren, Maddux, Chartrand, Bouter & van Knippenberg, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., de Bouter, C., & van Knippenberg, A.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
1093-1102
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2153582000
Cited by
296
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1R03 MH65250-01, R03MH065250)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-construal, interdependent self-construal, independent self-construal, mimicry, self-construal priming, cultural differences, assimilation
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cultural Characteristics, Female, Humans, Individuality, Japan, Male, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Students, Time Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review