Self-esteem reactions to social interactions: Evidence for sociometer mechanisms across days, people, and nations
Abstract
People have a fundamental need to belong that motivates them to seek out social interactions with close others (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). Leary and Baumeister's (2000) sociometer theory (SMT) poses that people who succeed in satisfying this need have higher self-esteem (SE). This prediction was tested across three hierarchical levels: intraindividual, interindividual, and international. Indicators of social interaction quantity, quality, and the interaction between quality and quantity were collected for relationships with friends, family members, and romantic partners. On the intraindividual level, relationship quality and the interaction between quantity and quality emerged as significant predictors of daily fluctuations in SE. Cross-lagged analyses indicated that this association is at least partly due to the effect of social inclusion on changes in SE. On an interindividual level, people who generally reported higher quality relationships also had higher levels of trait SE. On an international level, countries whose inhabitants regularly interact with friends were characterized by higher nationwide SE levels than countries without such practices, even when happiness, individualism, gross domestic product, and neuroticism were controlled.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Communal experiences predict state self-esteem, both in experimental studies manipulating social inclusion and in naturalistic settings with relationship quality as predictor.
“Consistent with this school of thought, communal experiences were found to predict state self-esteem, both in experimental studies in which social inclusion was manipulated (e.g., Leary et al., 1995) and in naturalistic settings with relationship quality as predictor (e.g., Denissen et al., 2008).”
From Self‐esteem development and life events: A review and integrative process framework (2022) · cites this paper as Denissen et al., 2008
Empirical tests of sociometer theory have treated state and trait self-esteem interchangeably.
“In addition, empirical tests of sociometer theory have treated state and trait self-esteem interchangeably (Denissen, Penke, Schmitt, & van Aken, 2008; Gebauer, M. R. Leary, & Neberich, 2012;Stinson et al., 2008).”
From Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. (2015) · cites this paper as Denissen, Penke, Schmitt, & van Aken, 2008
Social acceptability, as measured by others' liking or conversely by interpersonal conflict, was found to be a causal determinant of self-esteem and vice versa.
“social acceptability, as measured by others’ liking or conversely by interpersonal conflict, was found to be a causal determinant of self-esteem and vice versa”
From Why do people use Facebook? (2012) · cites this paper as Denissen, Penke, Schmitt, & van Aken, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 234
- Authors
- Denissen, J. J. A., Penke, L., Schmitt, D. P., & van Aken, M. A. G.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Bradley University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-196
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1994278734
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- self-esteem, sociometer theory, need to belong, social interaction quality, social inclusion, trait self-esteem, cross-national differences, friendship, family relationships, romantic relationships, happiness, individualism
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Family, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Motivation, Self Concept, Social Identification, Sociometric Techniques, Friends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review