The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Abstract
Abstract : This paper reports on a meta-analytic integration of the relation between group cohesiveness and performance. Overall, the cohesiveness-performance effect was highly significant and of small magnitude. Several theoretically informative determinants of the cohesiveness-performance effect were examined. This effect was significantly stronger when cohesiveness was operationalized in terms of measurements of group members' perceptions of cohesiveness than when cohesiveness was operationalized in terms of experimental inductions of cohesiveness. The results of this analysis suggest that the more direct effect may be from performance to cohesiveness rather than from cohesiveness to performance. Discussion considers the implications of these results for future research on the relation between cohesiveness and performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, there is robust evidence that cohesion contributes to performance, productivity, and behavioral change15,20–23.”
From Physiological and Behavioral Synchrony Predict Group Cohesion and Performance (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Review of personality and social psychology
Wheeler, L. S., & Shaver, P. R. (1980) · UMI Books on Demand · Cited by 3,593
Attention and Self-Regulation : A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,580
Informal social communication.
Festinger, L. (1950) · Research Center for Dynamics Institute for Social Research eBooks · doi:10.1037/10646-001 · Cited by 1,317
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration
Mullen, B. R., Brown, R. J., & Smith, C. (1992) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220202 · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationDeviation, rejection and communication
Schachter, S. (1951) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062326 · Cited by 1,165
Social Pressures in Informal Groups, a Study of Human Factors in Housing
Keller, M., Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1952) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348388 · Cited by 1,103
Mullen, B. R., & Goethals, G. R. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3 · Cited by 985
Self-citationProgress In Small Group Research
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.003101 · Cited by 946
George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. L. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698 · Cited by 914
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259266 · Cited by 4,216
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy
Bandura, A. (2000) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064 · Cited by 3,294
Metadata
- Authors
- Mullen, B., & Copper, C.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- ORCID
- Mullen, Brian
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 210-227
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1980511580
- Cited by
- 1,398
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 30.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- group cohesion, group performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
