Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique.

Ekman, Paul·1994·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

J. A. Russell (1994) misrepresents what universality means, misinterprets the evidence from past studies, and fails to consider or report findings that disagree with his position. New data are introduced that decisively answer the central question that Russell raises about the use of a forced-choice format in many of the past studies. This article also shows that his many other qualms about other aspects of the design of the studies of literate cultures have no merit. Russell's critique of the preliterate cultures is inaccurate; he does not fully disclose what those who studied preliterate subjects did or what they concluded that they had found. Taking account of all of Russell's qualms, my analysis shows that the evidence from both literate and preliterate cultures is overwhelming in support of universals in facial expressions.

Cites (10)

  1. An argument for basic emotions
    Ekman, Paul · 1992 · Cognition and Emotion
  2. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion
    Weiner, Bernard · 1985 · Psychological Review
  3. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.
    Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V. · 1971 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding
    EKMAN, PAUL, FRIESEN, WALLACE V. · 1969 · Semiotica
  5. Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion
    Lazarus, Richard S. · 1991 · American Psychologist
  6. Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies.
    Russell, James A. · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
  7. Face the beast and fear the face: animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion
    ÖHman, Arne · 1986 · Psychophysiology
  8. The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field
    Johnson-laird, P. N., Oatley, Keith · 1989 · Cognition & Emotion
  9. Emotion and autonomic nervous system activity in the Minangkabau of West Sumatra.
    Levenson, Robert W., Ekman, Paul, Heider, Karl, Friesen, Wallace V. · 1992 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  10. Facial Expression of Schizophrenic Patients and Their Interaction Partners
    Krause, Rainer, Steimer, Evelyne, Sänger-Alt, Cornelia, Wagner, Günter · 1989 · Psychiatry

Show all 10 references

Cited by (193)

  1. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
    Russell, James A. · 2003 · Psychological Review
  2. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.
    Gross, James J. · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. A Survey of Affect Recognition Methods: Audio, Visual, and Spontaneous Expressions
    Zhihong Zeng, Pantic, M., Roisman, G.I., Huang, T.S. · 2009 · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  4. Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms
    Scherer, K · 2003 · Speech Communication
  5. Are Emotions Natural Kinds?
    Barrett, Lisa Feldman · 2006 · Perspectives on Psychological Science

See all 1,130

Related (10)

  1. Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"
    Deborah Hawkins · 2017
  2. Where are Universals?
    Howard Peacock · 2016 · Metaphysica
  3. Transcendent Universals and Ontological Priority
    José Tomás Alvarado Marambio · 2020 · Synthese Library/Synthese library
  4. Indiscernible universals
    Gonzalo Rodriguez‐Pereyra · 2016 · Inquiry
  5. Universales indiscernibles
    Gonzalo Rodriguez‐Pereyra · 2021 · Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso

See all

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.115.2.268
The paper
Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.115.2.268