CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,687Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead.

Lerner, Melvin J., Miller, Dale T.·1978·Psychological Bulletin
DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
ORCID
Miller, Dale T.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1978-09
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
1030-1051
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
DOI
10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
OpenAlex
W2102050923
Cited by
1,687
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 52
FWCI
57.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
just world hypothesis, attribution processes, attribution theory, perceived fairness, victim blaming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review