The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Abstract
Reliability coefficients often take the form of intraclass correlation coefficients. In this article, guidelines are given for choosing among six different forms of the intraclass correlation for reliability studies in which n target are rated by k judges. Relevant to the choice of the coefficient are the appropriate statistical model for the reliability and the application to be made of the reliability results. Confidence intervals for each of the forms are reviewed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a result, the inter-rater agreement was quite high for categorical variables (mean Cohen's kappa = 0.73, SD = 0.13) and for continuous variables (mean intraclass correlation [26] = 0.80, SD = .14).”
From Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review (2010) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“we used the methodology Shrout and Fleiss (1979) describe and computed the Shrout-Fleiss single ICC score agreement of .998, which is considered quite high (Koo and Li 2016).”
From Driving Brand Engagement Through Online Social Influencers: An Empirical Investigation of Sponsored Blogging Campaigns (2019) · cites this paper as Shrout and Fleiss (1979)
In the citing paper
“In contrast, Cohen's quadratically weighted kappa converges to two-factor intraclass correlation coefficients with random and fixed raters (i.e., the so-called ICC (2,1) and ICC(3,1) coefficients), where the items and raters are the two factors (Carrasco, 2010;Fleiss & Cohen, 1973;Janson & Olsson, 2001;Schuster, 2004;Schuster & Smith, 2005;Shrout & Fleiss, 1979;Warrens, 2014).”
From Quadratically Weighted Agreement Coefficients: Interpretations and Connections (2026) · cites this paper as Shrout & Fleiss, 1979
In the citing paper
“A sample of 11% of video data was double coded by the researcher and an experienced coder (the developer of CHIPPA). Inter‐rater reliability was based on intra‐class correlation (ICC) statistics from the mean rating for the two coders (k = 2) using a two‐way mixed effects consistency model (see Table 2 below) and resulted in good to excellent reliability across the CHIPPA subscales (Koo & Li, 2016”
From A plausible role of imagination in pretend play, counterfactual reasoning, and executive functions (2023) · cites this paper as Shrout & Fleiss, 1979
In the citing paper
“The results suggest that coders showed high agreement (intraclass correlation [2, 1] = 0.85; Shrout & Fleiss, 1979).”
From Respiratory and cognitive mediators of treatment change in panic disorder: Evidence for intervention specificity. (2010) · cites this paper as Shrout & Fleiss, 1979
In the citing paper
“Interrater reliability of the pre- and posttreatment assessments was excellent (intraclass correlations [2, 1] = 0.97 and 0.96, respectively; Shrout & Fleiss, 1979).”
From Respiratory and cognitive mediators of treatment change in panic disorder: Evidence for intervention specificity. (2010) · cites this paper as Shrout & Fleiss, 1979
In the citing paper
“ICC decomposes observed variance into between-query variance (task difficulty) and within-query variance (agent inconsistency), highlighting whether reported results reflect true capability or measurement noise.”
From Stochasticity in Agentic Evaluations: Quantifying Inconsistency with Intraclass Correlation (2025) · cites this paper as Shrout and Fleiss 1979
In the citing paper
“The ICC quantifies the proportion of total variance attributable to differences between tasks and can be understood as a function of both the difficulty of the dataset (variance between tasks) and the consistency of the agent (variance within tasks).”
From Stochasticity in Agentic Evaluations: Quantifying Inconsistency with Intraclass Correlation (2025) · cites this paper as Shrout and Fleiss 1979
In the citing paper
“Reproducibility of the final placenta, fetus and amniotic fluid volume in millilitres was assessed using the ICC (2,1) [37], [38] for inter-observer repeatability between the semi-automated Random Walker results, regarded as the ground-truth used for performance evaluation, and the newly generated FCNN outputs.”
From Fully Automated 3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta, Amniotic Fluid, and Fetus for Early Pregnancy Assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312006001112 · Cited by 8,013
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,012
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967) · Cited by 6,573
Scheffé, H. (1960) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196006000-00016 · Cited by 5,625
An Approximate Distribution of Estimates of Variance Components
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3002019 · Cited by 4,373
The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability
Bartko, J. (1966) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3 · Cited by 2,206
Statistics for the social sciences
Hays, W. L. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,081
The theory of the estimation of test reliability
Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02288391 · Cited by 1,953
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 23,401–23,500 of 23,883
Noghani, F. V., Rotkopf, L. T., Schoenberg, S. O., et al. (2026) · Tomography · doi:10.3390/tomography12070102
Yang, C. R., Wang, Y., Tan, C. K., et al. (2026) · 2022 9th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) · doi:10.1109/biorob66782.2026.11681531
Yalçın, M., Özden, F., Başer, M., Uysal, İ., Özkeskin, M., Baykal, D., & Sarı, Z. (2026) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-026-10182-1
Zimmermann, A., Winkler, J. K., Kommoss, K. S., Vollmer, A. S., Toberer, F., Enk, A., Rosenberger, A., & Haenssle, H. A. (2026) · JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft · doi:10.1111/ddg.70363
Wabo, G. K., Sokolowski, P. P., Jannesari, M., Hagmann, M., Ganslandt, T., & Siegel, F. P. (2026) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/97661 · Cited by 1
Cary, T. L., Hong, S. M., Kowalkowski, A., et al. (2026) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.25-11-0255
Yu, X., Ding, S., Lu, W., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9991907/v1
Aydin, M. O., Coşkun, B. N., & Hamal, İ. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1866674 · Cited by 1
Fast and Fleeting: Evaluating ChatGPT’s Impact on Students’ Computational Thinking Skills
Mahmoud, M., Asare, E., Shahid, N., Sakr, N., & Nadi, S. (2026) · International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE) · doi:10.1145/3794860.3794894
Pastor-Cisneros, R., Mendoza-Muñoz, M., López‐Gil, J. F., et al. (2026) · Children · doi:10.3390/children13070906
Vittengl, J. R., Jarrett, R. B., Ro, E., & Clark, L. A. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.122240
Li, Q., Sun, Y., Ju, X., & Cui, J. (2026) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106603 · Cited by 1
Validación del SMHAT-1 en Futbolistas Chilenos: Análisis Psicométrico y Cultural
Gallardo, A., Ossa, C., Cárdenas, E., et al. (2026) · Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio FOD · doi:10.29105/rce-fod.v21i2.177
Kang, K. S., Lee, N.-K., Lee, K. M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113467
Eryılmaz, O. K., & Naldemir, İ. F. (2026) · Skeletal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00256-026-05260-w
From specimen to pixel: digital standardization and bias in frog body size estimates
Miguel, I. R., Woitovicz-Cardoso, M., & Hepp, F. S. F. D. S. (2026) · Zoomorphology · doi:10.1007/s00435-026-00795-x
Operational performance and cost–performance trade-offs of low-cost, farmer-scale biochar kilns
Asare, F., Gazo, R., Owusu, F. W., Saraugi, S. S., Routray, W., Mo, J., & Rahmani, S. R. (2026) · Biomass Futures · doi:10.1016/j.bmf.2026.100059
Beyond Simulation: A Task- and Persona-Adaptive Framework for AI in UX Evaluation
Guo, M., Li, J. J., Cheng, Y., Jin, Z., & Wang, L. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30552-7_34
Dogru, Z., & Kale, E. (2026) · Turkish Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1515/tjb-2026-0027
Mashaly, M., Akram, R. B., & Krishnan, H. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.112476
Asaftei-Titianu, G.-S., Ciubotaru, A., Baciu, L.-C., Bilcu, R.-V., Cucu, L.-E., Baltag, D., Ignat, B. E., & Cuciureanu, I. D. (2026) · Balneo and PRM Research Journal · doi:10.12680/balneo.2026.1057
Habenula volume alterations in adults born very preterm
Stüwe, T., Maurer, A., Daamen, M., Wichtmann, B. D., Ko, H. S., Upadhyay, N., Schmitz‐Koep, B., Essler, M., Luetkens, J., Zimmer, C., et al. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-61917-5
Bomans, S., Michotte, N., M’Rabet, I. E., et al. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0353132
Joonoh, L. E. E., Mistry, A., Cao, J., et al. (2026) · Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics · doi:10.1097/bpo.0000000000003407
Psychometric properties of the Turkish EQ-5D-5L in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
HATIR, A. E., Onmaz, M., & Demirbaş, N. (2026) · Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Dergisi · doi:10.20518/tjph.1854905
Streamlining ergonomic assessment of nonrepetitive workplaces
Manning, C., & Jorgensen, M. J. (2026) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2026.2686851
Image optimization for low-dose 18F-FDG breast PET/MRI using deep learning: a pilot study
Keigley, Q. J., Bancroft, L. C. H., Salem, K., et al. (2026) · EJNMMI Physics · doi:10.1186/s40658-026-00918-9
Timalsina, R., Subedi, M. S., Maharjan, N., Shah, B., & Adhikari, P. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0353748
Ro, Z. M., Shafie, N. A., San, Z. M., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10234134/v1
Knutson, M., Sauder, C. L., Vojtech, J. M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2026.06.049
Mansoubi, M., Fadavi, H., Massey, G. J., Chapman, K., Norouzi, K., Lamb, S. E., & Dawes, H. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.106921
Audiogram Detection AI Trained Using Size-Fixed Frame and Bounding-Boxes
Shishido, T., Shimmura, H., Kurihara, S., Ono, Y., Kumazawa, I., Okano, H. J., & Suzuki, K. (2026) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/s00354-026-00328-6
Ingoe, H., Ikink, W., Coates, M., et al. (2026) · JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques · doi:10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100824
Expert Judgments as an Approach to Evaluating Items’ Instructional Sensitivity
Leininger, S., Hochweber, J., Naumann, A., & Hartig, J. (2026) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2026.2702978
Medina, S. K., Cordovez-Fernández, M.-E., & Bustamante, C. (2026) · Texto Livre Linguagem e Tecnologia · doi:10.1590/1983-3652.2026.63123
Johnston, J. E., Berry, K. J., & Long, M. A. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26608-8_5
Nagata, K., Nakajima, K., Nakarai, H., et al. (2026) · Spine Deformity · doi:10.1007/s43390-026-01509-5
Ionescu, R.-G., Cârstea, A.-E., Vasilescu, V. G., Froimovici, F.-O., Spînu, T. C., Ciocan, L. T., & Ionescu, C. (2026) · Dentistry Journal · doi:10.3390/dj14070455
Framing Analytics with Large Language Models in Congressional Transcripts
Macías, S. C., & Keith, B. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32026-1_22
DeLeo, J. M., Eserhaut, D. A., Provost, J. A., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1791552
Kurniawati, F., Ananda, M., Hutagalung, F. D., Rahayu, W. F., & Abdillah, A. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1878996
Uluman, M., & Kotan, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7152638
Morlock, L. K., Rampf, S., Véliz, S., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Oral Health · doi:10.3389/froh.2026.1863588
Riad, R. K., Shalaby, E., & El-Hawary, H. (2026) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-09349-5
Sta, N., Oranchuk, D. J., Marshall, R. P., Schwesig, R., & Chelly, M. S. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16147270
Accurso, L., Couturier, V., Castonguay, T., Lamoureux, J., & Dover, G. C. (2026) · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · doi:10.3390/jfmk11030285
Hansen, M., & Bürki, A. (2026) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2026.104783
Are Creative People More Susceptible to False Memory? Evidence for Age- and Task-Related Differences
West, J. T., Luchini, S., Beaty, R., & Dennis, N. (2026) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2026.2703186
Bergamino, M., Ott, L. R., McElvogue, M. M., Jha, R. M., Moreno, C., Wong, R., & Stokes, A. M. (2026) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2026.150476
Inter- and intra-site reliability of forearm sweating induced by pilocarpine iontophoresis
Wang, H., Lu, M., Otsuka, J., Kato, H., & Amano, T. (2026) · The Journal of Physiological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jphyss.2026.100089
Суликоевич, Х. З., Mordanov, O., & Wehbe, A. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16152306
Schwarz, T., Schell-Majoor, L., Saak, S. K., et al. (2026) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/23312165261469957
Berardi, A., Panuccio, F., Vittone, A., et al. (2026) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/03080226261466105
Al‐shaari, H., Sayed, M., Faqihi, W. A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15155768
Holdaway, A. S., Owens, J. S., Chan, W., Helfrich, S. R., & Reddy, L. A. (2026) · Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation · doi:10.1080/10474412.2026.2697376
Rarbach, J., Schummers, G., Burgmair, A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2026-0092
Bouazizi, M., Baaziz, M., Abumuaili, Z. H., & Chéour, F. (2026) · Physical Education Theory and Methodology · doi:10.17309/tmfv.2026.4.08
Wu, T., Yu, H., Li, S., & Jiang, H. (2026) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001868
Adnyana, K., & Schwung, A. (2026) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.100960
Collins, K. C., Clark, A., Pomeroy, V. M., & Kennedy, N. C. (2026) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-026-01235-1
Buch, S., Sharma, S., Zadah, E. T., et al. (2026) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122149
Noel-Barker, N., Hillman, C., Pollon, E., Connors, E., Christie, C., Pettitt, W., Gallagher, J., Higgins, K., Riley, M., Bestwick-Stevenson, T., et al. (2026) · Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics · doi:10.1177/24730114261460463
Gao, J., Zhang, J., & Zhang, H. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9789559/v1
Mazza, P. M., Colomb, E. L., Yarden, J. A., & Moschetti, W. E. (2026) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2026.07.039
Wang, Y., Yao, Z., Zhang, Q., Xiong, Y., Huang, X., & Qian, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1859186
The reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for rating the single leg squat test
Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Huang, X., Carcia, C. R., Martin, R. L., & Pan, Z. (2026) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.21600
Bustos, P., Diethelm‐Varela, B., Riofrio, A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Fish Diseases · doi:10.1111/jfd.70260
Li, Y., Liao, Y., Dai, Y., Deng, J., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.70599
Can Generative AI Overcome the Innovation Paradox? Evidence from Early-Stage IdeationPreprint
Nadine, H., Joosten, J., Hahn, A., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7196245
Prompting for Independent Learning: An Evaluation of Tutoring Behaviors in GenAI
Hartley, K., Sáez-Delgado, F., & Mella-Norambuena, J. (2026) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi18080397
Lee, J. M., Lee, J., Kang, K. N., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1881901
Huang, S., Tseng, H.-P., Chen, Y.-H., Tan, Y.-L., Lee, J.-P., Wu, C., & Hsu, C. H. (2026) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-026-02167-9
Klabes, J., Fobugwe, B., Jiang, R., Xue, D., liu, Q., & Khanh, T. Q. (2026) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.604349
Zhong, C., Wu, S., Yu, J., Wu, W., Herremans, D., & Zhang, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7199726
Between the Labs: An Analysis of Individual Rating Biases in Multi-Lab Subjective Experiments
Robitza, W., & Raake, A. (2026) · International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex69967.2026.11618358
Validity and reliability of the smile perception scale in Turkish children aged 8–10 years
ÖZGÖÇMEN, E., AYVALLI, M., & Alkış, M. (2026) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-09440-x
Towards Driver Behavior Understanding: Weakly-Supervised Risk Perception in Driving Scenes
Agarwal, N., Chen, Y.-T., & Dariush, B. (2026) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/iv66570.2026.11623909 · Cited by 1
Hakiminejad, Y., Azimi, S., Gomero, L., Pantesco, E. J., Kan, I. P., Izzetoglu, M., & Tavakoli, A. (2026) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/iv66570.2026.11623875
N, the Natural Concordance Coefficient: The Exact Thermodynamics of ConsensusPreprint
Narbona-Sarria, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7119419
Li, X. (2026) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-026-02848-8
Azzarello, C. B., Paek, S., Hodge, C., Jameson, M. M., & Lewis, J. (2026) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-026-00389-8
Bryce, C., Riachi, M., Spivak, B., et al. (2026) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911261469030
Krendl, A. C., French, R. C., & Hughes, C. S. (2026) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2026.2712228
Kloidt, J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2026) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-026-03909-6
Eranna, P. K., Bhat, J. S., & Sarvajna, D. H. (2026) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2026.2710179
A benchmark dataset with human validation for AI-assisted technical answer evaluation
Sheikh, J. K., & Soni, H. K. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01975-z
Böker, K., Vogel, M., Grundmann, A., & Kieß, W. (2026) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-026-01788-1
岡西, 尚., 石黒, 翔., Kato, T., et al. (2026) · Discover Medicine · doi:10.1007/s44337-026-00655-z
Smooth or Jarring? Evaluating Video Transitions with TransiSense and VT-Bench
Das, A., Singh, N., & Gupta, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31927-2_21
Alsayed, M. I., Alsayed, M. M., Maghrabi, A., Alzahrani, A., Felemban, A., Badirah, S., Alabdulkarim, F. M., Sheitt, H., Hashem, D., Meer, E., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106637
Short-term test-retest reliability of a few proxy measures of cochlear synaptopathy
Arora, K., & Maruthy, S. (2026) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-026-10488-2
Evaluating Reliability and Bias of Large Language Models in Automated Essay Scoring
Lee, Y. (2026) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2026.2712300
Jung, J., Lee, S., Kim, D., et al. (2026) · Neurosurgical Review · doi:10.1007/s10143-026-04417-4
Coomer, S. C., Hipp, J. A., Chaput, C. D., et al. (2026) · North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ) · doi:10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100936
Ismail, Z. N. E., Hendi, A. E., & Abdelnaby, M. M. (2026) · Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s43166-026-00441-w
Li, S., Shrestha, L., Tuychiev, M., Jung, T. Y., Choi, R. W., & Miyamoto, K. (2026) · Journal of Cosmetics Dermatological Sciences and Applications · doi:10.4236/jcdsa.2026.163012
Lee, D., & Hancock, G. R. (2026) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986261478956
Surface Topographic Assessment of Forced Pulmonary Maneuvers
Groisser, B. N., Thakur, A., Hillstrom, H. J., Marsh, I., Williams, C. J., Senthilnathan, I. S., Wisch, J. L., Zucker, C. P., Cunningham, M. E., Hresko, M. T., et al. (2026) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2026.05.054
Metadata
- Authors
- Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- ORCID
- Shrout, Patrick E.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 420-428
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2141403362
- Cited by
- 24,532
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1452 · 2025: 1085 · 2024: 998 · 2023: 1023 · 2022: 1083 · 2021: 1379 · 2020: 1189 · 2019: 1116 · 2018: 1178 · 2017: 1113 · 2016: 1106 · 2015: 1057 · 2014: 1172 · 2013: 1044 · 2012: 914
- FWCI
- 13.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
- Keywords
- intraclass correlation coefficient, rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, reliability coefficients, confidence intervals, multiple raters
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
