Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis.
Abstract
Wake Forest University Research concerned with motivational distortion in the attribution of responsibility for an accident is reviewed. The results of a statistical combination of 22 relevant studies suggest a statistically significant but weak tendency to attribute more responsibility to an accident perpetrator for a severe than for a mild accident. An examination of interacting variables found, consistent with Shaver's defensive-attribution hypothesis, that when observers were personally and situationally similar to the accident perpetrator, they tended to attribute less responsibility to the perpetrator when accident severity increased. The opposite was found to be the case when the perceiver and the perpetrator were dissimilar. Experiments using stronger subject-involving manipulations also appeared more likely to produce evidence in support of the defensive-attribution hypothesis than did experiments with low-involvernent manipulations. The relationship between this model and other theoretical and conceptual approaches is discussed, and recommendations for future research are suggested. It is concluded that research strongly supports the defensive-attribution hypothesis when the similarity variables are considered, and that this effect represents one example of how perceivers' self-protective motives influence responsibility attributions.
Cites (4)
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Rosenthal, Robert · 1979 · Psychological Bulletin
- From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perceptionJones, Edward E., Davis, Keith E. · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead.Lerner, Melvin J., Miller, Dale T. · 1978 · Psychological Bulletin
- The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis.McCauley, Clark, Jacques, Susan · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (11)
- Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent ModelJones, Thomas M. · 1991 · The Academy of Management Review
- One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively DescribedRichard, F. D., Bond, Charles F., Stokes-Zoota, Juli J. · 2003 · Review of General Psychology
- A theory of blameMalle, Bertram F., Guglielmo, Steve, Monroe, Andrew E. · 2014 · Psychological Inquiry
- Is there a relation between locus of control orientation and depression?Benassi, Victor A., Sweeney, Paul D., Dufour, Charles L. · 1988 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Who gets the blame for service failures? Attribution of responsibility toward robot versus human service providers and service firmsLeo, Xuying, Huh, Young Eun · 2020 · Computers in Human Behavior
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.90.3.496
- The paper
- Burger, J. M. (1981). Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.90.3.496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.