The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.
Abstract
The authors propose a rule-plus-exception model (RULEX) of classification learning. According to RULEX, people learn to classify objects by forming simple logical rules and remembering occasional exceptions to those rules. Because the learning process in RULEX is stochastic, the model predicts that individual Ss will vary greatly in the particular rules that are formed and the exceptions that are stored. Averaged classification data are presumed to represent mixtures of these highly idiosyncratic rules and exceptions. RULEX accounts for numerous fundamental classification phenomena, including prototype and specific exemplar effects, sensitivity to correlational information, difficulty of learning linearly separable versus nonlinearly separable categories, selective attention effects, and difficulty of learning concepts with rules of differing complexity. RULEX also predicts distributions of generalization patterns observed at the individual subject level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Array models for category learning
Estes, W. K. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90008-3 · Cited by 356 · cited 4×
“According to exemplar models (e.g., Estes, 1986a; Hintzman, 1986; Kruschke, 1992; Medin & Schaffer, 1978; Nosofsky, 1986), category representations consist of the storage of all previously presented exemplars, and classification decisions involve massive similarity computations performed over these stored exemplars.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035032 · Cited by 1,163
Mental health stigma as social attribution: Implications for research methods and attitude change.
Corrigan, P. W. (2000) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.7.1.48 · Cited by 954
Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10003134 · Cited by 533
Vul (2014) · doi:10.1111/cogs.12101 · Cited by 502
A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210701802071 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-79
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W1990198033
- Cited by
- 789
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.