The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1,086 of the 1,090 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Abstract
This article presents a new theory of subjective probability according to which different descriptions of the same event can give rise to different judgments. The experimental evidence confirms the major predictions of the theory. First, judged probability increases by unpacking the focal hypothesis and decreases by unpacking the alternative hypothesis. Second, judged probabilities are complementary in the binary case and subadditive in the general case, contrary to both classical and revisionist models of belief. Third, subadditivity is more pronounced for probability judgments than for frequency judgments and is enhanced by compatible evidence. The theory provides a unified treatment of a wide range of empirical findings. It is extended to ordinal judgments and to the assessment of upper and lower probabilities. Both laypeople and experts are often called upon to evaluate the probability of uncertain events such as the outcome of a trial, the result of a medical operation, the success of a business venture, or the winner of a football game. Such assessments play an important role in deciding, respectively, whether to go to court, undergo surgery, invest in the venture, or bet on the home team. Uncertainty is usually expressed in verbal terms (e.g., unlikely or probable), but numerical estimates are also common. Weather forecasters, for example, often report the probability of rain (Murphy, 1985), and economists are sometimes required to estimate the chances of recession (Zarnowitz, 1985). The theoretical and practical significance of subjective probability has inspired psychologists, philosophers, and statisticians to investigate this notion from both descriptive and prescriptive standpoints.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the unpacking effect, participants judge, say, 'being a lawyer', to be less probable than the 'unpacked' description 'being a tax, corporate, patent, or other type of lawyer' [44][45][46].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“when guided to where the peaks are (i.e., starting the android from a different location), for example, by being asked about the pattern _ _ _ _ ing in the more detailed description, then large peaks are found and probability estimates are higher [31,45].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Self-citationSelf-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Self-citationThe satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Vector Space Semantic Models Predict Subjective Probability Judgments for Real-World Events.
Bhatia, S. (2016) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 1
Gaviria, C., & Jiménez‐Leal, W. (2014) · Crítica (México D F En línea) · doi:10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2014.589 · Cited by 1
The effects of tool comparisons when estimating the likelihood of task success
Li, S., Miller, J. E., Stuart, J. O., Jules, S. J., Scherer, A. M., Smith, A. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008354 · Cited by 1
Updating incoherent credences ‐ Extending the Dutch strategy argument for conditionalization
Bona, G. D., & Staffel, J. (2021) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12827 · Cited by 1
Pfister, H. R., Jungermann, H., & Fischer, K. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53038-2_5 · Cited by 1
Audi, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195145397.003.0002 · Cited by 2
Mele, A. R., & Rawling, P. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195145397.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Gernand, J. M. (2022) · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4055156 · Cited by 1
Lyu, X., Li, Z., Ma, Q., & She, M. (2022) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2022.2118836 · Cited by 1
Incorporating Diagnostic Expectations into the New Keynesian Framework
Cleveland, F. R. B. O., L’Huillier, J.-P., Singh, S. R., Francisco, F. R. B. O. S., Yoo, D., & Sinica, A. (2023) · Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper Series · doi:10.24148/wp2023-19 · Cited by 1
Chick, S. E., Hawkins, S. A., & Soberman, D. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257031 · Cited by 1
Who shows the Unlikelihood Effect – and why?
Ingendahl, M., Woitzel, J., & Alves, H. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02453-z · Cited by 3
Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation
Dhami, M. K., Belton, I., de Werd, P., Hadzhieva, V., & Wicke, L. (2024) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-024-00560-y · Cited by 2
Thorstad, D. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198886143.003.0003 · Cited by 2
The False Balance Effect: Exploring Partition Dependence as a Potential Explanation
Han, T., Snook, B., & Day, M. V. (2025) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70025 · Cited by 1
Motahhar, V. K., & Gruca, T. S. (2025) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.12.001 · Cited by 1
Emphasis on Financial vs Nonfinancial Criteria in Employer Benefits’ Measurements
Pfeffer, J., Olsen, E., & Singer, S. J. (2025) · JAMA Health Forum · doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5229 · Cited by 1
Anchoring and subjective belief distributions
Holm, H. J., Samahita, M., van Veldhuizen, R., & Wengström, E. (2025) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107304 · Cited by 1
Effective Decision Making in a Life Company
Iqbal, M. (2005) · British Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1017/s1357321700003172 · Cited by 1
LEGAL THEORY AND THE RATIONAL ACTOR
Finkelstein, C. (2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195145397.003.0021 · Cited by 2
Identifying, Structuring, and Comparing the Objectives of Al Qaeda and ISIL
Siebert, J. U., & Keeney, G. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316676714.016 · Cited by 3
Methods for Addressing the Unpredictable Real-World Element in Security
Cui, J., Nguyen, T. H., Pita, J., & John, R. S. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316676714.024 · Cited by 1
Relations between type of army service, incidental emotions and risk perceptions
Garyn‐Tal, S., & Shahrabani, S. (2020) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-020-00224-6 · Cited by 1
Risk perception with imperfect information and social interactions: Understanding group polarization
Pelletan, J. (2021) · Bulletin of Economic Research · doi:10.1111/boer.12272 · Cited by 1
Schwarz, M. E. (2022) · Constitutional Political Economy · doi:10.1007/s10602-022-09363-z · Cited by 1
Umgang mit Zahlen und Wahrscheinlichkeiten
Wenski, G. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-64776-9_9 · Cited by 1
Instrumentalização do planejamento estratégico: aplicação no setor aeroviário comercial brasileiro
da Silva, L. M. D. A. (2001) · doi:10.11606/t.12.2001.tde-27032006-095314 · Cited by 1
Cypryańska, M. (2009) · Decyzje · Cited by 1
Uncertainty in the physical, social, and virtual worlds
Smithson, M. J. (2002) · Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS) · doi:10.1109/nafips.2000.877374 · Cited by 1
Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.045 · Cited by 1
In Search of Prototypes and Feminist Bank-Tellers: Exploring the Representativeness Heuristic
Nilsson, H. (2008) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Reconciling support theory and the book-making principle
Diecidue, E., & La‐ornual, D. (2009) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-009-9062-4 · Cited by 1
Costello, F., & Watts, P. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Do Analysts Strategically Provide Cash Flow Forecasts? A Multi-Theory Multi-Methods StudyPreprint
Yoo, C., Pae, J., & Salterio, S. E. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1966830 · Cited by 1
PROCESS AND REPRESENTATION IN MULTIPLE-CUE JUDGMENT
Olsson, A.-C. (2002) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Studies of experience based decision making
Broomell, S. B. (2010) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
Cunningham, B., & Karlene, S. (2010) · Cited by 1
Non-pecuniary Costs of Sarbanes Oxley
Kipperman, F., McAfee, R. P., & Vakkur, N. V. (2008) · Cited by 1
Prava, V. (2016) · Cited by 1
Psychologie Ergonomique de l'Optimisation des Processus Décisionnels
Raufaste, É. (2003) · HAL · Cited by 1
When Less Is More: Counterfactual Thinking and Satisfaction among Olympic Medalists
Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.037 · Cited by 1
Good Recognition is Non-MetricPreprint
Scheirer, W. J., Wilber, M. J., Eckmann, M., & Boult, T. E. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1302.4673 · Cited by 1
Choice with Limited CapacityPreprint
Geng, S., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1
Yoshino, N., & Angrick, S. (n.d.) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1
Time ≠ Time ≠ Time: Mental Temporal AccountingPreprint
Puaschunder, J. M. (2019) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3375365
Failures of Contingent ThinkingPreprint
Piermont, E., & Zuazo-Garin, P. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.07703 · Cited by 1
Endowment NeglectPreprint
Sela, A., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2467794 · Cited by 1
Sakti, A., Fuchs, E. R. H., Michalek, J. J., Gallagher, K. G., & Whitacre, J. F. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2868386 · Cited by 1
Subjectively Salient: Contrast Effects in Investor Responses to Stock ReturnsPreprint
Antoniou, C., Guo, J., & Stewart, N. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3777778 · Cited by 1
Joyce, J. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195145397.003.0008 · Cited by 2
Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2009) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15084 · Cited by 1
Fischhoff, B. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00345-4 · Cited by 1
Information Theory and Biased BeliefsPreprint
Little, A. T. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/vfqy2 · Cited by 1
Military and Security Applications: Behavioral Modeling
Caballero, W. N., & Lunday, B. J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54621-2_759-1 · Cited by 1
Review: Models of Human Probability Judgment ErrorsPreprint
Huang, J. A. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xbwng · Cited by 1
Sign Theory: A Non-Extensional Theory of PreferencePreprint
Lin, S., & Slovic, P. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1565023 · Cited by 1
Application to Decision Making Theory and Cognitive Science
Asano, M., Khrennikov, A. Y., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., & Yamato, I. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9819-8_6
Noisy Reasoners: Errors of Judgement in Humans and AIs
Costello, F. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_4
Learning under uncertainty: a model-based approach for understanding gambling behaviour
Yu, E. C. (2011) · Doctoral thesis, UCL (University College London).
da Silva, L. M. D. A., Lucas, L. A., & da Costa, M. P. (2009) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ndm2009.43
Emotion, competence and confidence in choice under uncertaintyPreprint
Maffioletti, A., & Santoni, M. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Cerroni, S., Notaro, S., & Shaw, W. D. (2011) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.114313
Cerroni, S., Notaro, S., & Shaw, W. D. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.124100
Police Officers and Biased Policing
Schneider, C. (2015)
Kardes, F. R., Goddard, P., Han, X., & Pfeiffer, B. E. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781444395150.ch27
Society for Judgement and Decision Making 1996年大会
山岸, 侯. (1997) · 認知科学 = Cognitive studies : bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society · doi:10.11225/jcss.4.1_162
Bordley, R. F. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0627
A post-classical economics approach to ecosystem management
Hearnshaw, E. J. S. (2009) · Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University)
Brandstätter, E., & Riedl, R. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment · doi:10.1002/9780470061596.risk0519
Fischhoff, B. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.61132-7
Shadow Probability Theory for Asset Pricing under AmbiguityPreprint
Izhakian, Y. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1937645
Looking at Information Security through a Prospect Theory Lens
Arora, H., Steinbart, P. J., & Shao, B. B. M. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Understanding Conjunction Fallacies: An Evidence Theory Model of Representativeness
Brachinger, H. W. (2005) · Theory and decision library. Series C, Game theory, mathematical programming and operations research · doi:10.1007/0-387-25706-3_16
Toward addressing human behavior with observational uncertainty in security games
Pita, J., Yang, R., Tambe, M., & John, R. S. (2011) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
The Epistemic Approach: Logicist Interpretation
Courgeau, D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2879-0_3
Brüggen, A., Grabner, I., & Sedatole, K. L. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2482321
Does correction for guessing improve the realism in absolute and relative frequency judgements
Romu, T.-O. (2005) · Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)
Sartori, G., & Rumiati, R. (2005) · Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) · doi:10.1421/19689
Measuring conformability of probabilities
Bravata, D. M., Cottle, R. W., Eaves, B. C., & Olkin, I. (2001) · Statistics & Probability Letters · doi:10.1016/s0167-7152(00)00237-6
El efecto del marco en diferentes contextes
Piñón, A., & Gambara, H. (2006) · Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología · doi:10.1174/021093906777571655 · Cited by 1
Subjective Probability and Information: A Constructive Perspective
Yılmaz, M. (2003) · American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences · doi:10.1080/01966324.2003.10737602
Bélanger, J. J. (2011) · University Libraries (University of Maryland)
Nakamura, K., & Yamagishi, K. (2009) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2009.00392.x
Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
Redelmeier, D. A. (1996) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9601600418
Out of sequence communications can affect causal judgement
Patrick, J., Bott, L. A., Morgan, P. L., & King, S. L. (2012) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2012.658240
Hansson, P. (2005) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Perceptual Frames in Frequency Estimation
Żyłowska, A., Kossek, M., & Wawrzyniak, M. (2014) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/03.49.pr0.114k13w7
Factors Shaping Process and Representation in Multiple-Cue Judgment
Olsson, A.-C. (2004) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Dhami, S. (2010)
Subjective Time Perception and
Zauberman, G. S., Kim, B. K., Malkoc, S. A., & Bettman, J. R. (2009)
Confusión e ignorancia en la decisión con incertidumbre y riesgo
Ayza, J. M. P. (2009) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Confidence Following ChoicePreprint
Davies, T. R. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2213084
Wong, R. S., Wong, W. H., & Seng, H. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
An Investigation of Basic Probability Operations Using AND and OR Operations
Tsoi, J. (2007) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
Asset Pricing Without ProbabilityPreprint
Cassese, G. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.650023
Behavioural aspects of senior executive reward systems
Pepper, A. (2010) · Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey)
Hertwig (1999) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199912)12:4
Metadata
- Authors
- Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Koehler, Derek J.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-567
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2054875343
- Cited by
- 1,167
- References
- 1,090
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- subjective probability, support theory, subadditivity, alternative hypothesis, lower and upper probabilities, probability judgment, frequency judgment, belief revision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
