Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 182 of the 182 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder as a Disturbance of Security Motivation.

Open access
Szechtman, Henry, Woody, Erik·2004·Psychological Review

Abstract

The authors hypothesize that the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), despite their apparent nonrationality, have what might be termed an epistemic origin--that is, they stem from an inability to generate the normal "feeling of knowing" that would otherwise signal task completion and terminate the expression of a security motivational system. The authors compare their satiety-signal construct, which they term yedasentience, to various other senses of the feeling of knowing and indicate why OCD-like symptoms would stem from the abnormal absence of such a terminator emotion. In addition, they advance a tentative neuropsychological model to explain its underpinnings. The proposed model integrates many previous disparate observations and concepts about OCD and embeds it within the broader understanding of normal motivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.111

Cites

182 of 182 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 182 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Chiocca, 1990, Neurosurgical therapy of obsessive-compulsive disorder., 283
  2. Davis. 1999 · doi:10.2307/3235249
  3. Dawson, 1999, Gödel and the limits of logic., Scientific American, 280, 76, 10.1038/scientificamerican0699-76 · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0699-76
  4. Dodman, 1997, Veterinary models of OCD., 99
  5. Goodman, 1991, Pharmacologic challenges in obsessive-compulsive disorder., 162
  6. Groenewegen. 1999 · doi:10.1080/10427719900000142
  7. Haber. 1999 · doi:10.1002/pf.2407
  8. Haley, 1984, Ordeal therapy: Unusual ways to change behavior.
  9. Janet, 1963, Les obessions et la psychasthénie
  10. MacLean, 1973, Special award lecture: New findings on brain function and sociosexual behavior., 53
  11. Mahoney. 2000 · doi:10.2307/1073915
  12. 10.1037/0096-3445.113.2.282 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.2.282 · Paper page
  13. Rasmussen, 1991, Phenomenology of OCD: Clinical subtypes, heterogeneity and coexistence., 13
  14. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.330 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.330 · Paper page
  15. Stephen, 1900, Samuel Johnson.
  16. Swedo, 1989, Rituals and releasers: An ethological model of obsessive-compulsive disorder., 269
  17. 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.001353 · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.001353
  18. Wise, 1989, Obsessive compulsive disorder-Is it a basal ganglia dysfunction?, 327

Cited by

See all 370

Metadata

Authors
Szechtman, H., & Woody, E.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2004
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
111-127
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W1990483036
Cited by
370
References
182
FWCI
17.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder as a Disturbance of Security Motivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.111
The paper
Szechtman, H., & Woody, E. (2004). Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder as a Disturbance of Security Motivation. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.