Cited by 426Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Glutamate abnormalities in obsessive compulsive disorder: neurobiology, pathophysiology, and treatment

Open access
Pittenger, Christopher, Bloch, Michael H., Williams, Kyle·2011·Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Obsessive compulsive disorder is prevalent, disabling, incompletely understood, and often resistant to current therapies. Established treatments consist of specialized cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy with medications targeting serotonergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission. However, remission is rare, and more than a quarter of OCD sufferers receive little or no benefit from these approaches, even when they are optimally delivered. New insights into the disorder, and new treatment strategies, are urgently needed. Recent evidence suggests that the ubiquitous excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate is dysregulated in OCD, and that this dysregulation may contribute to the pathophysiology of the disorder. Here we review the current state of this evidence, including neuroimaging studies, genetics, neurochemical investigations, and insights from animal models. Finally, we review recent findings from small clinical trials of glutamate-modulating medications in treatment-refractory OCD. The precise role of glutamate dysregulation in OCD remains unclear, and we lack blinded, well-controlled studies demonstrating therapeutic benefit from glutamate-modulating agents. Nevertheless, the evidence supporting some important perturbation of glutamate in the disorder is increasingly strong. This new perspective on the pathophysiology of OCD, which complements the older focus on monoaminergic neurotransmission, constitutes an important focus of current research and a promising area for the ongoing development of new therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.09.006

Cites

227 of 227 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structural abnormalities in CSTC circuits involving OFC, ACC, and striatum have been repeatedly demonstrated in OCD.

    “structural abnormalities in CSTC circuits involving orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and striatum have been repeatedly demonstrated in OCD 51–53.”
  • The role of SLC1A1 in OCD is supported by the observation that riluzole can be beneficial in the treatment of OCD and by the finding of elevated glutamate levels in the CSF of OCD patients.

    “The role of this glutamate transporter gene in OCD is also supported by the observation that the anti-glutamatergic drug riluzole can be beneficial in the treatment of OCD and by the finding of elevated glutamate levels in the CSF of OCD patients (Pittenger et al. 2011).”

    From The neurobiological link between OCD and ADHD (2014) · cites this paper as Pittenger et al. 2011

  • Various neurotransmitters, including serotonin, dopamine and glutamate, are implicated in the pathophysiology of OCD.

    “Studies using neurochemical and neuroimaging methods have shown that various neurotransmitters are implicated in the pathophysiology of this disorder, including serotonin [1], dopamine [2] and glutamate [3].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 229 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Epelbaum J Sequence variants in SLITRK1 and Tourette's syndrome Med Sci (Paris) 2005 21 12 1117 16324657

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pittenger, C., Bloch, M. H., & Williams, K.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Pittenger, Christopher
Venue
Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
314-332
ISSN
0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109125813
Cited by
426
References
229
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH083115, K08MH081190, K23MH091240, R25MH077823)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, glutamate, glutamate dysregulation, treatment-refractory OCD, pathophysiology, excitatory neurotransmission, neuroimaging, animal models, cognitive behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Neurobiology, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Neurotransmitter Agents, Glutamic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review