Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Career of Metaphor.

Bowdle, Brian F., Gentner, Dedre·2005·Psychological Review

Abstract

A central question in metaphor research is how metaphors establish mappings between concepts from different domains. The authors propose an evolutionary path based on structure-mapping theory. This hypothesis--the career of metaphor--postulates a shift in mode of mapping from comparison to categorization as metaphors are conventionalized. Moreover, as demonstrated by 3 experiments, this processing shift is reflected in the very language that people use to make figurative assertions. The career of metaphor hypothesis offers a unified theoretical framework that can resolve the debate between comparison and categorization models of metaphor. This account further suggests that whether metaphors are processed directly or indirectly, and whether they operate at the level of individual concepts or entire conceptual domains, will depend both on their degree of conventionality and on their linguistic form.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.193

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 140 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1207/s15327868ms1401_5 · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1401_5
  2. 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.612 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.612
  3. 10.1037/0278-7393.15.1.153 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.1.153 · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295 · DOI
  5. Brooks, 1978, Non analytic concept formation and memory for instances., 169
  6. Connor, 1980, Topic-vehicle relations in metaphor: The issue of asymmetry., 283
  7. 10.1007/BF01067612 · doi:10.1007/bf01067612
  8. 10.2307/1130388 · doi:10.2307/1130388 · Paper page
  9. Gentner, (in press). The development of relational category knowledge.
  10. 10.1207/S15327868MS1603&4_6 · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1603&4_6
  11. Gentner, 1988, Evidence for relational selectivity in interpreting analogy and metaphor., 307
  12. Gentner, (in press). Relational categories.
  13. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.1.45 · Paper page
  14. 10.1207/s15327868ms0504_1 · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0504_1
  15. 10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.572 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.572
  16. Gibbs, 1994, The poetics of mind.
  17. 10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.1.3 · Paper page
  18. Hoffman, 1980, Metaphor in science., 393
  19. Holyoak, 1995, Mental leaps.
  20. Honeck, 1987, Figurative language and psychological views of categorization: Two ships in the night?, 103
  21. 10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80016-2 · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(87)80016-2
  22. 10.1207/s15327868ms1102_3 · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1102_3
  23. Johnson, 1980, Toward a perceptual theory of metaphoric comprehension., 259
  24. 10.1007/BF01067583 · doi:10.1007/bf01067583
  25. 10.1207/s15327868ms0201_3 · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0201_3
  26. 10.1207/s15327868ms0502_5 · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0502_5
  27. Kittay. Semantic fields and the structure of metaphor. 5 31 1981 · doi:10.1075/sl.5.1.03kit
  28. 10.2307/1131753 · DOI
  29. Kovecses, 1988, The language of love.
  30. Kuhn, 1979, Metaphor in science., 409
  31. 10.1016/0024-3841(78)90001-3 · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(78)90001-3
  32. Lehrer. Polysemy, conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon. I 207 1990 · doi:10.1515/cogl.1990.1.2.207
  33. 10.1007/BF01067947 · doi:10.1007/bf01067947
  34. Malgady, 1980, Measurement of figurative language: Semantic feature models of comprehension and appreciation., 239
  35. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.254 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.254 · Paper page
  36. 10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.3.289 · Paper page
  37. 10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.398 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.398 · Paper page
  39. 10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.161 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.3.161 · Paper page
  40. 10.2307/1129551 · doi:10.2307/1129551
  41. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.42 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.42 · Paper page
  42. Searle, 1979, Metaphor., 92
  43. 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90125-2 · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(87)90125-2
  44. Smith. Metaphor as intellectual history: Conceptual categories underlying figurative usage in American English from 1675-1975. 19 911 1981 · doi:10.1515/ling.1981.19.9-10.911
  45. Turner. The availability of conventional and of literal meaning during the comprehension of proverbs. 5 199 1997 · doi:10.1075/pc.5.2.02tur
  46. Verbrugge, 1980, Transformations in knowing: A realist view of metaphor., 87

Cited by

See all 1,293

Metadata

Authors
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2005
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
193-216
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2041542944
Cited by
1,293
References
140
FWCI
27.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Career of Metaphor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.193
The paper
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The Career of Metaphor. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.193

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.