Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity.

Sam Glucksberg, Boaz Keysar·1990·Psychological Review

Abstract

Traditionally, metaphors such as "my job is a jail " have been treated as implicit similes (i.e., this metaphor would be treated as if it were a comparison statement, "my job is like a jail"). Tversky's account of similarity is applied to such nonliteral similarity expressions, and is shown to apply as readily to nonliteral comparisons as to literal comparisons. But treating metaphors as comparison statements fails to account for certain important phenomena, including metaphoricity itself (the judgment that a comparison statement is nonliteral). We argue that metaphors are exactly what they appear to be: class-inclusion assertions, in which the topic of the metaphor (e.g., "my job") is as-signed to a diagnostic category (e.g., entities that confine one against one's will, are unpleasant, are difficult to escape from). In such assertions, the metaphor vehicle (e.g., "jail") refers to that category, and at the same time is a prototypical exemplar of that category. This account of metaphor provides a basis for a theory of metaphor comprehension, and also clarifies why people use metaphors instead of similes. How do people understand nonliteral expressions such as my grandfather is a baby? Taken literally, this sentence seems false. A grandfather must be an adult, and an adult cannot be of an

Cites (2)

  1. Logic and Conversation
    Grice, H. P. · 1975 · Speech Acts
  2. Ad hoc categories
    Barsalou, Lawrence W. · 1983 · Memory & Cognition

Show all 2 references

Cited by (7)

  1. The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability From Inferential Soundness
    Gentner, D., Rattermann, M.J., Forbus, K.D. · 1993 · Cognitive Psychology
  2. Metaphor and Poetic Figures
    Shen, Yeshayahu · 2008 · The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought
  3. Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor?
    Blasko, Dawn G. · 1999 · Journal of Pragmatics
  4. Clinical and experimental perspectives on metaphorical talk
    McCurry, S · 1992 · Clinical Psychology Review
  5. Abstract Concepts and the Embodied Mind: Rethinking Grounded Cognition
    Dove, Guy · 2022

See all 867

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.97.1.3
The paper
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.97.1.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.