The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior.
Abstract
Soft constraints hypothesis (SCH) is a rational analysis approach that holds that the mixture of perceptual-motor and cognitive resources allocated for interactive behavior is adjusted based on temporal cost-benefit tradeoffs. Alternative approaches maintain that cognitive resources are in some sense protected or conserved in that greater amounts of perceptual-motor effort will be expended to conserve lesser amounts of cognitive effort. One alternative, the minimum memory hypothesis (MMH), holds that people favor strategies that minimize the use of memory. SCH is compared with MMH across 3 experiments and with predictions of an Ideal Performer Model that uses ACT-R's memory system in a reinforcement learning approach that maximizes expected utility by minimizing time. Model and data support the SCH view of resource allocation; at the under 1000-ms level of analysis, mixtures of cognitive and perceptual-motor resources are adjusted based on their cost-benefit tradeoffs for interactive behavior.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Raising the costs of externalisations (e.g., by adding additional physical or temporal demands) increases the use of internal strategies such as memory-based processing, whereas lowering the costs of externalisations increases the use of technical tools (e.g., Cary & Carlson, 2001; Gray & Fu, 2004; Gray et al., 2006; Morgan & Patrick, 2013; O’Hara & Payne, 1998; Schönpflug, 1986).”
From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Gray et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“the work of Fu and Gray (2000; see also Gray et al., 2006; Grinschgl, Meyerhoff, & Papenmeier, 2020; Patrick et al., 2015; Waldron et al., 2011) has shown that increasing access costs by adding temporal delays for each inspection of the model window results in a shift from offloading strategies to more memory-based strategies. Thus, higher temporal costs reduce offloading behaviour.”
From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Gray et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Watkins, C., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine-mediated learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022676722315 · Cited by 14,277
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00992698 · Cited by 9,083
Norman, D. A. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,415
Detection Theory: A User's Guide
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991) · Cited by 5,415
Six views of embodied cognition
Wilson, M. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196322 · Cited by 4,782
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5376 · Cited by 4,218
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203736166 · Cited by 4,103
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Carlson, 2000, Cognitive control of multiplestep routines: Information processing and conscious intentions., 443
- 10.1037/1076-898X.6.4.322 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0364-0213(94)90007-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80026-5 · DOI
- 10.1511/2002.3.236 · DOI
- Ritter. Using a simulated user to explore human-robot interfaces. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics
- Simon, 1996, The sciences of the artificial
- 10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.1052 · DOI
- Todd, (in press). Disintegrated architectures of cognition: The adaptive toolbox for decision making.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 362
Understanding the cognitive miser: Cue-utilization in effort-based decision making
Dunn, T. L., & Risko, E. F. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102863 · Cited by 26
Process Systems Engineering and the Human-in-The-Loop: The Smart Control Room
Ghosh, S., & Bequette, B. W. (2019) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04739 · Cited by 20
Improving the effectiveness of an interruption lag by inducing a memory-based strategy
Morgan, P. L., Patrick, J., & Tiley, L. (2012) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.003 · Cited by 23
Avoiding the problem state bottleneck by strategic use of the environment
Borst, J. P., Buwalda, T. A., van Rijn, H., & Taatgen, N. A. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.016 · Cited by 19
Markman, A. B. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.11.005 · Cited by 20
Framing cognitive offloading in terms of gains or losses: achieving a more optimal use of reminders
Fröscher, L., Friedrich, A.-K., Berentelg, M., Widmer, C. K., Gilbert, S. J., & Papenmeier, F. (2022) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-022-00416-3 · Cited by 23
Adaptive Allocation of Vision under Competing Task Demands
Sims, C. R., Jacobs, R. A., & Knill, D. C. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4240-10.2011 · Cited by 20
Self-citationFarmer, G., Janssen, C. P., Nguyen, A. T., & Brumby, D. P. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12513 · Cited by 20
Brunyé, T. T., Collier, Z. A., Cantelon, J. A., Holmes, A., Wood, M. D., Linkov, I., & Taylor, H. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124404 · Cited by 20
The influence of training and experience on memory strategy
Patrick, J., Morgan, P. L., Smy, V., Tiley, L., Seeby, H., Patrick, T., & Evans, J. (2015) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0501-3 · Cited by 19
Richardson, E., & Keil, F. C. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105073 · Cited by 18
Morgan, P. L., & Patrick, J. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.702117 · Cited by 19
Kezunović, M., Waller, S. T., & Damnjanovic, I. D. (2010) · IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech) · doi:10.1109/green.2010.5453787 · Cited by 18
Repeated Web Page Visits and the Scanpath Theory: A Recurrent Pattern Detection Approach
Burmester, M., & Mast, M. (2010) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.3.4.5 · Cited by 18
Adaptive but non-optimal visual search behavior with highlighted displays
Tamborello, F. P., & Byrne, M. D. (2007) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.05.003 · Cited by 17
Sibert, C., Gray, W. D., & Lindstedt, J. K. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12225 · Cited by 19
Self-citationInvestigating the Post-Training Persistence of Expert Interaction Techniques
Lafreniere, B. J., Gutwin, C. A., & Cockburn, A. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3119928 · Cited by 17
Loss Aversion and Preferences in Interaction
Quinn, P., & Cockburn, A. (2018) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2018.1433040 · Cited by 19
Melioration Dominates Maximization: Stable Suboptimal Performance Despite Global Feedback
Neth, H., Sims, C. R., & Gray, W. D. (2006) · KOPS (University of Konstanz) · Cited by 17
Self-citationThe Human-Computer System: Towards an Operational Model for Problem Solving
Ribarsky, W., & Fisher, B. (2016) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.183 · Cited by 16
Predicting Short‐Term Remembering as Boundedly Optimal Strategy Choice
Howes, A., Duggan, G. B., Kalidindi, K., Tseng, Y., & Lewis, R. L. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12271 · Cited by 17
Control used and control felt: Two sides of the agency coin
Potts, C. A., & Carlson, R. A. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01771-y · Cited by 17
A New Hope: Human-Centric Cybersecurity Research Embedded Within Organizations
Morgan, P. L., Asquith, P. M., Bishop, L. M., Raywood-Burke, G., Wedgbury, A., & Jones, K. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50309-3_14 · Cited by 19
Thornton, I. M., Nguyen, T. T. N., & Kristjansson, A. K. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820961640 · Cited by 15
Clark, A. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-046616-3.00003-7 · Cited by 14
Clark, A. (2010) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzr002 · Cited by 15
Use of Complementary Actions Decreases with Expertise
Destefano, M., Lindstedt, J. K., & Gray, W. D. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14
Self-citationHigh spatial validity is not sufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention
Pauszek, J. R., & Gibson, B. S. (2016) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1097-4 · Cited by 14
Improving Recommender Systems Beyond the AlgorithmPreprint
Schnabel, T., Bennett, P. N., & Joachims, T. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.07578 · Cited by 14
Supporting Dynamic Instructional Design Decisions Within a Bounded Rationality
Stefaniak, J. E., Tawfik, A. A., & Sentz, J. (2022) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-022-00792-z · Cited by 14
Back, J., Cox, A. L., & Brumby, D. P. (2012) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208289 · Cited by 13
Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity
Raghunath, N., Fournier, L. R., & Kogan, C. J. (2020) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01373-6 · Cited by 13
The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?
Thornton, I. M., Tagu, J., Zdravković, S., & Kristjansson, A. K. (2021) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00299-w · Cited by 14
Dunn, T. L., Gaspar, C., McLean, D., Koehler, D. J., & Risko, E. F. (2021) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000039 · Cited by 16
Jin, T., He, J., Wang, W., Wu, Z., & Gu, H. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2148859 · Cited by 13
Gaschler, R., Marewski, J. N., Wenke, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01388 · Cited by 13
Shaping Feedback Data in Recommender Systems with Interventions Based on Information Foraging Theory
Schnabel, T., Bennett, P. N., & Joachims, T. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3289600.3290974 · Cited by 13
Onyper, S. V., Hoyer, W. J., & Cerella, J. (2008) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825580701879907 · Cited by 13
Evaluating Effort: Influences of Evaluation Mode on Judgments of Task‐specific Efforts
Dunn, T. L., Koehler, D. J., & Risko, E. F. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2018 · Cited by 15
Visualization as a stimulus domain for vision science
Rensink, R. A. (2021) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.21.8.3 · Cited by 15
Multifaceted consequences of visual distraction during natural behaviour
Kumle, L., Võ, M. L. ‐., Nobre, A. C., & Draschkow, D. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00099-0 · Cited by 12
What Makes a UI Simple? Difficulty and Complexity in Tasks Engaging Visual-Spatial Working Memory
Bakaev, M., & Разумникова, О. М. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13010021 · Cited by 12
Yang, X. J., Wickens, C. D., Park, T., Fong, L., & Siah, K. T. H. (2015) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815598889 · Cited by 13
Hoogerbrugge, A. J., Strauch, C., Böing, S., Nijboer, T. C. W., & der Stigchel, S. V. (2024) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.364 · Cited by 13
An empirical investigation into how users adapt to mobile phone auto-locks in a multitask setting
Brumby, D. P., & Seyedi, V. (2012) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/2371574.2371616 · Cited by 11
Children’s adaptive pre-decisional search behavior: Effects of memory and number of alternatives
Katz, I., Bereby‐Meyer, Y., Assor, A., & Danziger, S. (2009) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.09.003 · Cited by 12
Lindell, M. K., House, D. H., Gestring, J., & Wu, H. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1119-3 · Cited by 11
Does task sustainability provide a unified measure of subjective task difficulty?
Rosenbaum, D. Α., & Bui, B. V. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01631-8 · Cited by 11
Perseveration on cognitive strategies
Weis, P. P., & Kunde, W. (2023) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-023-01475-7 · Cited by 11
Personal Rapid Transit and Its Development
McDonald, S. S. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5844-9_671 · Cited by 11
Rupert, R. D. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195379457.003.0007 · Cited by 11
Representation control increases task efficiency in complex graphical representations
Moritz, J., Meyerhoff, H. S., Meyer-Dernbecher, C., & Schwan, S. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196420 · Cited by 11
Effort avoidance is not simply error avoidance
Feghhi, I., & Rosenbaum, D. Α. (2020) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01331-2 · Cited by 11
Verbalization of Decision Strategies in Multiple‐Cue Probabilistic Inference
Walsh, M. M., & Gluck, K. A. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1878 · Cited by 11
Designing information fusion for the encoding of visual–spatial information
Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., Duggan, G. B., Banbury, S. P., & Howes, A. (2008) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130701811933 · Cited by 11
Cognitive Modeling for Cognitive Engineering
Gray, W. D. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816772.025 · Cited by 11
Self-citationRosen, M. A. (2010) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 11
Increasing Accuracy by Decreasing Presentation Quality in Transcription Tasks
Soboczenski, F., Cairns, P. A., & Cox, A. L. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_25 · Cited by 10
Testing the rehearsal hypothesis with two FastTap interfaces
Gutwin, C. A., Cockburn, A., & Lafreniere, B. J. (2015) · Proceedings · doi:10.20380/gi2015.29 · Cited by 10
Perceptual processing demands influence voluntary task choice
Mittelstädt, V., Miller, J. O., & Kiesel, A. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105232 · Cited by 12
Bounded Optimal State Estimation and Control in Visual Search: Explaining Distractor Ratio Effects
Myers, C. W., Lewis, R. L., & Howes, A. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 10
Calling while Driving Using Augmented Reality: Blessing or Curse?
Kun, A. L., van der Meulen, H., & Janssen, C. P. (2018) · PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1162/pres_a_00316 · Cited by 10
Mittelstädt, V., Schaffernak, I., Miller, J. O., & Kiesel, A. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820970079 · Cited by 10
Cognitive systems and the supersized mind
Rupert, R. D. (2010) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9600-6 · Cited by 10
More than 8,192 ways to skin a cat: Modeling behavior in multidimensional strategy spaces
Smith, M. R., Lewis, R. L., Howes, A., Chu, A., Green, C., & Vera, A. H. (2008) · Cited by 10
Towards a common code for difficulty: Navigating a narrow gap is like memorizing an extra digit
Feghhi, I., Franchak, J. M., & Rosenbaum, D. Α. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02356-4 · Cited by 9
Hardieß, G., & Mallot, H. A. (2015) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.05.017 · Cited by 9
Morgan, P. L., Waldron, S. M., King, S. L., & Patrick, J. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73345-4_15 · Cited by 9
Hardieß, G., Basten, K., & Mallot, H. A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018494 · Cited by 9
Qing, T., Strauch, C., van Maanen, L., & der Stigchel, S. V. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02623-z · Cited by 10
Yang, X. J., Park, T., Wickens, C. D., Siah, K. T. H., Fong, L., & Yin, S. Q. (2013) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213571391 · Cited by 8
Computational Model of the Transition from Novice to Expert Interaction Techniques
Bailly, G., Khamassi, M., & Girard, B. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3505557 · Cited by 11
Benefit-cost trade-offs-based empathic choices
Ge, Y., Li, X., Li, F., Chen, F., Sun, B., & Li, W. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111875 · Cited by 8
Behavioral Systems Management of Confined Microsocieties: An Agenda for Research and Applications
Emurian, H. H., Canfield, K., Roma, P. G., Gasior, E. D., Brinson, Z. S., Hienz, R. D., Hursh, S. R., & Brady, J. V. (2009) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2009-01-2423 · Cited by 8
A Dynamic Context Model of Interactive Behavior
Fu, W. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01173.x · Cited by 8
Self-citationExternal Working Memory and the Amount of Distributed Cognition
Maeda, N. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 8
Arranging Objects in Space: Measuring Task‐Relevant Organizational Behaviors During Goal Pursuit
Solman, G. J. F., & Kingstone, A. F. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12391 · Cited by 8
Speed Considerations Can Be of Little Concern When Outsourcing Thought to External Devices
Weis, P. P., & Wiese, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621004 · Cited by 6
An Approach to Human-Level Commonsense Reasoning
Anderson, M. L., Gomaa, W. E., Grant, J., & Perlis, D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_12 · Cited by 7
The effect of strategy game types on inhibition
Leong, A. Y. C., Yong, M. H., & Lin, M.-H. (2022) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01632-0 · Cited by 14
The effect of strategy game types on inhibition
Leong, A. Y. C. *., Yong, M. H., & Lin, M. H. *. (2022) · Sunway Institutional Repository (Sunway University) · Cited by 7
An investigation of the saving‐enhanced memory effect: The role of test order and list saving
Tsai, P., Sachdeva, C., Gilbert, S. J., & Scarampi, C. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4067 · Cited by 7
Changing perspective: Zooming in and out during visual search.
Solman, G. J. F., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0029707 · Cited by 7
Designing Interfaces that Encourage a More Effortful Cognitive Strategy
Morgan, P. L., & Patrick, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193121005400429 · Cited by 7
Reflections of the social environment in chimpanzee memory: applying rational analysis beyond humans
Stevens, J. R., Marewski, J. N., Schooler, L. J., & Gilby, I. C. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160293 · Cited by 7
Tied to expectations: Predicting features speeds processing even under adverse circumstances
Schwager, S., Gaschler, R., Rünger, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0683-y · Cited by 7
Interruptions, visual cues, and the microstructure of interaction: Four laboratory studies
Weng, M., Huber, S. L., Vilgan, E., Grundgeiger, T., & Sanderson, P. M. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.002 · Cited by 7
The Price is Right: A High Information Access Cost Facilitates Category Learning
Wood, M. J., Fry, M., & Blair, M. R. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 7
Which cognitive tools do we prefer to use, and is that preference rational?
Alexandre, B., Navarro, J., Reynaud, E., & Osiurak, F. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.005 · Cited by 7
Schoelles, M. J., Neth, H., Myers, C. W., & Gray, W. D. (2006) · KOPS (University of Konstanz) · Cited by 7
Self-citationWeis, P. P., & Kunde, W. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56836-2 · Cited by 8
Comparing target detection errors in visual search and manually-assisted search
Solman, G. J. F., Hickey, K., & Smilek, D. (2014) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0641-3 · Cited by 6
Das, A., & Stuerzlinger, W. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Age differences in motivation drive performance during the sustained attention to response task
Hanzal, S., Learmonth, G., Thut, G., & Harvey, M. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324694 · Cited by 5
Judgements of effort as a function of post-trial versus post-task elicitation
Ashburner, M., & Risko, E. F. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211005759 · Cited by 5
Age‐related advantage for recall of complex naturalistic information following cognitive offloading
Burnett, L. K., & Richmond, L. L. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4217 · Cited by 5
PHEVs and BEVs in Coupled Power and Transportation Systems
Kezunović, M., & Waller, S. T. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1492-1_824 · Cited by 5
Squeezing the Balloon: Analyzing the Unpredictable Effects of Cognitive Workload
Ralph, J., Gray, W. D., & Schoelles, M. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193121005400407 · Cited by 5
Self-citationCognition, material culture and religious ritual
Krátký, J. (2012) · Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religion (JBASR) · doi:10.1558/jbasr.32487 · Cited by 5
The psychology of task management: The smaller tasks trap
Rusou, Z., Amar, M., & Ayal, S. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007518 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 461-482
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2104514002
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research (N000140310046)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620-03-1-0143)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- resource allocation, cognitive effort, ACT-R, reinforcement learning, expected utility, interactive behavior
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Reinforcement, Psychology, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review