Cited by 77Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

Analyses of parent–infant interaction

Thomas, Ewart A., Martin, John A.·1976·Psychological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.83.2.141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each person's behavior is affected both by one's own prior behavior (self-contingency) and by that of the partner (interactive contingency).

    “Each person’s behavior is affected both by one’s own prior behavior (self-contingency) and by that of the partner (interactive contingency) (Thomas and Malone, 1979; Thomas and Martin, 1976).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, E. A., & Martin, J. A.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1976-03
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
141-156
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2031520691
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
parent-infant interaction, parent-infant relationship, infant development, parent-infant communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review