Cited by 95Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Infant gaze, head, face and self-touch at 4 months differentiate secure vs. avoidant attachment at 1 year: a microanalytic approach

Koulomzin, Marina, Beebe, Beatrice, Anderson, Samuel, Jaffe, Joseph, Feldstein, Stanley, Crown, Cynthia·2002·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

The study attempted to distinguish avoidant vs. secure infants at 1 year from 4-month infant behavior only, during a face-to-face play interaction with the mother. Thirty-five 4-month-old infants were coded second by second for infant gaze, head orientation, facial expression and self-touch/mouthing behavior. Mother behavior was not coded. At 1 year, 27 of these infants were classified as secure (B), and 8 as avoidant (A) attachment in the Ainsworth Strange Situation. Compared with the B infant, the future A infant spent less time paying 'focused' visual attention (a look of a minimum 2 seconds duration) to the mother's face. Only if the A infant engaged in self-touch/mouthing behavior did its focused visual attention match that of the B. Markovian t to t+1 transition matrices then showed that both for future A and for future B infants, focused visual attention on the mother constrained the movements of the head to within 60 degrees from center vis-à-vis, defining head/gaze co-ordination within an attentional-interpersonal space. However, infant maintenance of head/gaze co-ordination was associated with self-touch/mouthing behavior for the A infant but not the B. Positive affect was associated with a disruption of head/gaze co-ordination for the A but not the B. Whereas the B had more variable facial behavior, potentially providing more facial signaling for the mother, the A had more variable tactile/mouthing behavior, changing patterns of self-soothing more often. Thus, infants classified as A vs. B at 12 months showed different behavioral patterns in face-to-face play with their mothers as early as 4 months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616730210123120

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koulomzin, M., Beebe, B., Anderson, S., Jaffe, J., Feldstein, S., & Crown, C.
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2002-05
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
3-24
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W2166851259
Cited by
95
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh041675-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH41675)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
infant attachment, attachment avoidance, secure attachment, infant gaze, head orientation, facial expressions, self-touch, mouthing behavior, mother-infant interaction, self-soothing, positive affect
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Facial Expression, Fixation, Ocular, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Mother-Child Relations, Object Attachment, Play and Playthings, Sampling Studies, Touch, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review