The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach.
Abstract
Visual recognition, navigation, tracking, and imagery are posited to share certain high-level processing subsystems. In the first part of this article, a theory of some of these subsystems is formulated. This theory is developed in light of an analysis of problems that must be solved by the visual system and the constraints on the solutions to these problems; computational, neurological, and behavioral constraints are considered. In the second part, inferences about perceptual subsystems are used to develop a theory of how mental images are generated. Support for this theory is adduced from studies of split-brain patients and a review of relevant neuropsychological findings. In the third part, a computational mechanism is developed to account for how visual function becomes lateralized in the brain; this mechanism is used to predict how the hypothesized processing subsystems become lateralized. In the fourth part, some critical tests of the theory of lateralization of perceptual processing subsystems are reported, and in the fifth part the theory is extended to account for the lateralization of image-transformation subsystems. In the sixth part, the theory is used to account for the almost ubiquitous variability (both between subjects and within subjects) evident in the neuropsychological literature on lateralization. Finally, in the concluding part of the article, the computational-neuropsychological approach is discussed and evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825
The Biological Foundations of Language
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 · Cited by 6,605
Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(83)90190-x · Cited by 2,947
Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1977) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1977.0085 · Cited by 2,608
A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect
Mesulam, M. ‐. (1981) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410100402 · Cited by 2,498
Dissociated visual perceptual and spatial deficits in focal lesions of the right hemisphere
Newcombe, F., & Russell, W. R. (1969) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.32.2.73 · Cited by 201
Cited by
The dynamics of proactivity at work
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · Cited by 2,057
Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric
Scott, L. M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209396 · Cited by 788
Distinct prefrontal cortex activity associated with item memory and source memory for visual shapes
Slotnick, S. D., Moo, L. R., Segal, J. B., & Hart, J. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00082-x · Cited by 654
Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?
Decety, J. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00033-x · Cited by 643
Visual Mental Imagery Activates Topographically Organized Visual Cortex: PET Investigations
Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, N. M., Thompson, W. L., Maljkovic, V., Weise, S. B., Chabris, C. F., Hamilton, S. E., Rauch, S. L., & Buonanno, F. S. (1993) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.3.263 · Cited by 641
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kosslyn, S. M.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 148-175
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2086862929
- Cited by
- 946
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 30.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.