Cited by 1,879Categorization, perception, and languageMemory Processes and InfluencesLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

Ad hoc categories

Open access
Barsalou, Lawrence W.·1983·Memory & Cognition

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03196968

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If a prediction (embodied concept) matches incoming sensory information and prediction error is minimized, similar features from the past are pieced together to give meaning to the present, constructing a situated or ad hoc category.

    “If a prediction (i.e. the embodied concept) matches the incoming sensory information and the prediction error is minimized, similar features from the past are pieced together to give meaning to the present: constructing a situated or ad hoc category (Fig. 4).50,51,110,138,139”

    From A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [138]

    In “Constructing Category Concepts for Ad Hoc Categories” (page unavailable), Barsalou says novel categories can be constructed from properties in memory; the Discussion also says relevant contexts and current goals prime ad hoc categories. The paper does not connect that construction to an embodied prediction matching sensory input or to minimized prediction error. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]3. BARSALOU, L. W. Determinants of graded structure in categories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1981.
  2. [16]16. HORTON, M. Category familiarity and taxonomic organization in young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1982.
  3. [31]31. ROSCH, E. H. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 192-233.
  4. [43]43. ZADEH, L. A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8, 338-353. NOTES

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barsalou, L. W.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
1983-05
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
211-227
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W2037838725
Cited by
1,879
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 79
FWCI
19.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Emory University
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
ad hoc categories, category formation, similarity analysis
MeSH terms
Cognition, Concept Formation, Discrimination Learning, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review