The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms.
Abstract
When a letter and a tone are presented in rapid succession, there is substantial interference if both require an overt response (the dual-task paradigm), but there is very little interference if the tone is a signal to inhibit the response to the letter (the slopping paradigm). These effects were replicated under common stimulus conditions in two experiments, and they were compared with effects in a change paradigm, in which the tone required an overt response, like the dual-task paradigm, but was also a signal to inhibit the response to the letter, like the stopping paradigm. In the change paradigm, the overt response to the tone suffered interference only if subjects failed to inhibit the concurrent response to the letter; inhibiting the response to the letter virtually eliminated the interference. The results suggest that differences in response competition are primarily responsible for differences in interference between the dual-task and stopping paradigms. More generally, the results support response-competition interpretations of dual-task interference. In a typical dual-task experiment, people are presented with two stimuli in rapid succession and are required to respond to each stimulus as quickly as possible. Typically, there is substantial interference between the two tasks, particularly when the
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“indicating that adaptive training in conflict resolution tasks improves performance in other tasks also thought to require conflict resolution mechanisms”
From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Logan and Burkell, 1986
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Egeth, H. E., & Kahneman, D. J. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421603 · Cited by 6,976
Lane, S. D. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315506173-8 · Cited by 4,707
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.295 · Cited by 2,590
Self-citationBergum, B. O., Long, J. B., & Baddeley, A. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422199 · Cited by 2,240
Attention: Some theoretical considerations.
Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0039515 · Cited by 1,922
Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0031333 · Cited by 1,751
On the economy of the human-processing system.
Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.3.214 · Cited by 1,737
Parasuraman, R., & DAVIES, D. R. (1984) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 1,566
Carterette, E. C., & Friedman, M. P. (1977) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/00006324-197710000-00013 · Cited by 1,566
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory
Pashler, H. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220 · Cited by 3,112
Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. (1997) · Psychology Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3 · Cited by 1,510
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control.
Logan, G. D., Zandt, T. V., Verbruggen, F., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0035230 · Cited by 911
Self-citationModels of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014 · Cited by 771
Self-citationHorse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure
Band, G. P. H., van der Molen, M. W., & Logan, G. D. (2003) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00079-3 · Cited by 687
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Logan, Gordon D.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 549-563
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W1971052805
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (8510365)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- dual-task interference, response competition, response inhibition, response-dependence, overt response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
