Cited by 400Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionLanguage Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants.

Best, Catherine T., McRoberts, Gerald W., Sithole, Nomathemba M.·1988·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.345

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 305

Metadata

Authors
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
1988
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
345-360
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W4238515972
Cited by
400
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
perceptual reorganization, English-speaking adults, infant speech perception, second language acquisition, speech perception development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review