The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adult performance on non-native contrasts could be increased by a number of factors: (i) the use of techniques that minimize the effects of memory (33, 34), (ii) extensive training (35, 36), and (iii) the use of contrasts, such as Zulu clicks, that are not related to native-language categories (37, 38).”
From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“These studies suggest that a speech sound from a foreign language that is similar, but not identical, to one in the subject's native language is perceptually assimilated to the native-languagesound (Best, McRoberts, & Sithole, 1988;Flege, 1987).”
From Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not (1991) · cites this paper as Best, McRoberts, & Sithole, 1988
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–305 of 305
Neural encoding of native and non-native speech sounds in quiet and in background noise
Antony, R., Martin, B., Shafer, V., & Behrens, S. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1823312
“Many studies have demonstrated speech perception difficulty for non-native speech (e.g., Best et al., 1988; Best, 1995; Flege, 1988).”
Identification of consonant length in L2 Italian: the role of cross-linguistic influence
Pešková, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Language Sciences · doi:10.3389/flang.2026.1911194
Metadata
- Authors
- Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M.
- ORCID
- Best, Catherine T.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-360
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W4238515972
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- perceptual reorganization, English-speaking adults, infant speech perception, second language acquisition, speech perception development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
