The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adult performance on non-native contrasts could be increased by a number of factors: (i) the use of techniques that minimize the effects of memory (33, 34), (ii) extensive training (35, 36), and (iii) the use of contrasts, such as Zulu clicks, that are not related to native-language categories (37, 38).”
From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“These studies suggest that a speech sound from a foreign language that is similar, but not identical, to one in the subject's native language is perceptually assimilated to the native-languagesound (Best, McRoberts, & Sithole, 1988;Flege, 1987).”
From Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not (1991) · cites this paper as Best, McRoberts, & Sithole, 1988
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 305
Learning nonnative speech sounds changes local encoding in the adult human cortex
Yi, H., Chandrasekaran, B., Nourski, K. V., Rhone, A. E., Schuerman, W. L., Howard, M. A., Chang, E. F., & Leonard, M. K. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2101777118 · Cited by 13
“This trade-off reflects the need to learn and maintain robust representations of behaviorally relevant stimuli such as speech, both during development (3, 7, 14) and in adulthood (21, 25).”
BackgroundThe nature of non-native speech sound representations
Baese‐Berk, M. M., Chandrasekaran, B., & Roark, C. L. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0015230 · Cited by 12
Matusevych, Y., Schatz, T., Kamper, H., Feldman, N. H., & Goldwater, S. J. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13314 · Cited by 11
“…phone discrimination tasks (Bosch & Sebastián-Gallés, 2003; Best & McRoberts, 2003; Burns et al., 2007; Kuhl et al., 2006; Segal et al., 2016; Tsao et al., 2006; Werker & Tees, 1984, etc.), using paradigms such as conditioned head turn (Kuhl, 1979) or habituation (Best, McRoberts, & Sithole, 1988).”
MethodIs there a self-monitoring speech perception system?
Ludlow, C. L., & Barac-Cikoja, D. (1998) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0021-9924(98)00022-7 · Cited by 11
An acoustic perspective on 45 years of infant speech perception, Part 1: Consonants
Narayan, C. R. (2019) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12352 · Cited by 15
Nasals and Nasalization in Spanish and Portuguese
Goodin-Mayeda, C. E. (2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9 · Cited by 14
Infant Discrimination of a Morphologically Relevant Word‐Final Contrast
Fais, L., Kajikawa, S., Amano, S., et al. (2009) · Infancy · doi:10.1080/15250000902994255 · Cited by 10
Height Differences in English Dialects: Consequences for Processing and Representation
Scharinger, M., & Lahiri, A. (2010) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830909357154 · Cited by 10
Early Development of the Human Auditory System
Werner, L. A. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-3479-7.10171-5 · Cited by 10
Kim, H., & Jongman, A. (2021) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309211037720 · Cited by 9
“The way L1 affects L2 acquisition has been well-documented (e.g., Best, 1995; Best et al., 1988; Bradlow et al., 1997; Flege, 1987, 1991; Flege & Hillenbrand, 1984; Flege & Port, 1981; Fox, et al., 1995; Nittrouer & Burton, 2005).”
Schmid, G., Thielmann, A., & Ziegler, W. (2009) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699200802399913 · Cited by 9
“For instance, Best and Avery (1999) and Best, McRoberts, and Sithole (1988) found a right ear advantage for clicks in speakers of Zulu (who have these sounds as phonemes in the phoneme inventory of their native language), but not in European participants, demonstrating that the differences in…”
BackgroundError Analysis of Korean-English Bilingual Children’s Speech Productions
Kim, J., Ballard, E., & McCann, C. (2016) · Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders · doi:10.21849/cacd.2016.00052 · Cited by 9
Descending auditory pathway and identification of phonetic contrast by native listeners
Shastri, U., Mythri, H. M., & Uppunda, A. K. (2014) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4861350 · Cited by 8
Vokic, G. (2008) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03296.x · Cited by 8
Vocabulary Learning in Bilingual First‐Language Acquisition and Late Second‐Language Learning
de Groot, A. M. B. (2012) · doi:10.1002/9781118432501.ch23 · Cited by 8
Early Development of the Human Auditory System
Anbuhl, K. L., Uhler, K. M., Werner, L. A., & Tollin, D. J. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-35214-7.00138-4 · Cited by 8
Learning to identify a foreign language
Bond, Z. S., Stockmal, V. B., & Muljani, D. (1998) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0388-0001(98)00009-6 · Cited by 7
Dufour, S., Nguyen, N., Pattamadilok, C., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2016) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4962562 · Cited by 6
The more, the better? Behavioral and neural correlates of frequent and infrequent vowel exposure
Tsuji, S., Fikkert, P., Minagawa‐Kawai, Y., Emmanuel Dupoux, A., Filippin, L., Versteegh, M., Peter Hagoort, A., & Cristià, A. (2017) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21534 · Cited by 5
“A trial was terminated when the infant looked away for more than 2 s (Best et al., 1988).”
BackgroundDevelopment of Speech Perception
Gervain, J. (2022) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81542-4_8 · Cited by 6
McKelvie‐Sebileau, P., & Davis, C. (2014) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4870701 · Cited by 6
L’influence de la langue maternelle dans la perception de la parole
Dufour, S., & Nguyen, N. (2008) · TIPA Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage · doi:10.4000/tipa.272 · Cited by 6
“En accord avec leur modèle (The Perceptual Assimilation Model), Best et al. (1988) ont montré que la discrimination de clics zoulous était possible par des auditeurs anglais, ces clics n’étant pas susceptibles d’être assimilés à une catégorie phonémique de la langue anglaise.”
BackgroundFast phonetic learning in very young infants: what it shows, and what it doesn't show
Bohn, O., & Polka, L. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00511 · Cited by 6
Speech, Vision, and Music Perception: Windows on the Ontogeny of Mind
Lynch, M. P., Eilers, R. E., & Bornstein, M. H. (1992) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735692201001 · Cited by 6
L'acquisition du langage. Volume I
Kail, M., & Bassano, D. (2000) · Presses Universitaires de France eBooks · doi:10.3917/puf.fayol.2000.01.0029 · Cited by 6
The Emergence of Phonological Representation
Donegan, P. J. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118346136.ch1 · Cited by 6
“…and “soft” consonant groups of Slavic languages), differential learning of L2 sounds that can and cannot readily be identified with an L1 phoneme (Best, McRoberts, and Sithole, 1988), and language-determined differences in perceptual abilities (as in Trehub, 1976; Werker and Tees, 1984b;…”
BackgroundMelguy, Y. V. (2017) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830917710828 · Cited by 5
“However, although this sort of phenomenon is well-documented in the monolingual perception research (Best & Strange, 1992; Best, McRoberts, & Goodell, 2001; Best, Traill, Carter, & Faber, 2003; Best et al., 1988; Hallé, Best, & Levitt, 1999; Polka, 1991, 1992, 1995; Tyler, Best, Faber, & Levitt, 2014), the issue of ho…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJusczyk, P. W. (1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012497770-9.50010-8 · Cited by 5
Revealing the mother tongue’s nurturing effects on the infant ear
Best, C. T. (2002) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(02)00111-x · Cited by 4
Self-citationSetter, J. E. (2017) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amw041 · Cited by 4
The Impact of Phonological Biases on Mispronunciation Sensitivity and Novel Accent Adaptation
Holzen, K. V., van Ommen, S., White, K. S., et al. (2022) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2022.2071717 · Cited by 4
“Nespor et al. (2003) described a “division of labor” between consonants and vowels, with consonants playing a more important role in lexical processing and vowels playing a more important role in grammatical and prosodic processing.”
Phonemic contrasts under construction? Evidence from Basque
Larraza, S., Molnar, M. T., & Samuel, A. G. (2020) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12330 · Cited by 4
Bouchon, C., & Toro, J. M. (2019) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01280-3 · Cited by 5
Early Development of the Human Auditory System
Werner, L. A. (2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7216-9654-6.50179-x · Cited by 4
McRoberts, G. W. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.23616-x · Cited by 5
Self-citationAn auditory perspective on phonological development in infancy
Hegde, M., Nazzi, T., & Cabrera, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1321311 · Cited by 3
Floccia, C., & Bertoncini, J. (1993) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61667-2 · Cited by 5
The influence of a first language: training nonnative listeners on voicing contrasts
Tuninetti, A., & Tokowicz, N. (2018) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1421318 · Cited by 3
CVC syllables for investigating the phonetic sensitivity of Mandarin and English speakers
Munro, M. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.1.147 · Cited by 3
Infant’s Speech Perception Research: A Literature Review and an Outlook for Related Korean Studies
Choi, Y., & Choi, M. (2016) · Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disorders · doi:10.12963/csd.16284 · Cited by 3
Language, Thought, and Consumer Research
Merunka, D. R., & Peterson, R. A. (2007) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1548-6435(2007)0000003010 · Cited by 3
López-Bascuas, L. E. (1994) · Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología · doi:10.1174/02109399460578971 · Cited by 3
Do Cantonese listeners have a non-native advantage in English stress-related lexical decision?
Choi, W. (2024) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/02676583241304549 · Cited by 2
“Best et al., 1988; Dupoux et al., 2010; Iverson et al., 2003).”
A Cross-Language Comparison of Length Perception in Italian-Learning Adults
Pešková, A., & Chládková, K. (2026) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309261440514 · Cited by 2
Kalaivanan, K., Wong, P. C. M., Wong, F. C. K., & Chan, A. H. D. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00199 · Cited by 2
Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition
Penke, M. (2009) · Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft · doi:10.1515/zfsw.2009.010 · Cited by 2
“Best et al. 1988).3 When the brain specialized and optimized for processing L1 data is faced with critically different language data from a L2, a restructuring has to take place that allows for learning the L2.”
BackgroundMethodPersonality, Category, and Cross-Linguistic Speech Sound Processing: A Connectivistic View
Lan, Y., & Li, X. (2014) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1155/2014/586504 · Cited by 2
Oshodi, B. (2013) · Issues in Language Studies · doi:10.33736/ils.1675.2013 · Cited by 2
“However, studies such Best, McRoberts, and Sithole (1988), Fledge (1995) and Eckman (2008) have observed that differences between the sounds systems of languages do not automatically denote area of difficulty for L2 learners.”
BackgroundChan, A. Y. W. (2013) · Open Journal of Modern Linguistics · doi:10.4236/ojml.2013.33025 · Cited by 3
Nittrouer, S. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119184096.ch18 · Cited by 2
Antony, R., Martin, B., Shafer, V. L., & Behrens, S. J. (2024) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-22-00531 · Cited by 1
Oliveira, D. S., Casenhiser, D. M., Hedrick, M. S., Teixeira, A. J. S., & Bunta, F. (2016) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2016.1152508 · Cited by 1
Processing Constraints on Learning
Gómez, R. L. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331059.003.0010 · Cited by 1
Jamieson, D. G., & Yu, K. (1996) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.1109/icslp.1996.607889 · Cited by 1
Dunn, D. H. (2022) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2022.0015 · Cited by 1
Culture, Language, and Emotion: Explorations in Development
Tardif, T. Z. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119301981.ch4 · Cited by 1
Acquisition de la structure syllabique du français par des apprenants japonais
Sauzedde, B. (2018) · doi:10.70675/c4c8fe89zee95z4a0dzb83az401ba5d72393 · Cited by 1
Speech Perception, Development of
Jusczyk, P. W. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470018860.s00523
Comparative Phonetics and Phonology
Hayes‐Harb, R. (2012) · The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0160
2. From citizens of the world to language specialists
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.02ch2
5. Studies on the perception of nasals and nasalization in Spanish and Portuguese
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.05ch5
3. Coarticulation and nasalization
Goodin-Mayeda, C. E. (2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.03ch3
A systematic approach to compute perceptual distribution of monosyllables
Wu, Y., Jia, J., Lu, F. H., et al. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952327
Mismatched crowdsourcing: Mining latent skills to acquire speech transcriptions
Hasegawa‐Johnson, M., Jyothi, P., Chen, W., et al. (2017) · 2018 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers · doi:10.1109/acssc.2017.8335558
“accuracy on this task, as measured by [8], was 88%.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlvarez-Cienfuegos, C., & Carrillo, M. (2003) · Presses universitaires de Rennes eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.pur.48477
Pál, E. (2018) · Acta Universtitatis Sapientiae. Philologica · doi:10.2478/ausp-2018-0010
The Causes of Learner Pronunciation Problems in English
Rothgerber, J. R. (2019) · Advances in linguistics and communication studies · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8467-4.ch015
An eye-tracking study of letter-sound correspondence in Japanese-speaking 2- to 3-year-old toddlers
Higuchi, H., Okumura, Y., & Kobayashi, T. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79062-y
Jusczyk, P. W., & Luce, P. A. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426.pas0112
(2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444343069.refs
(1994) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb00184.x
Gonzalez-Gomez, N. (2020) · The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/9781119171492.wecad124
The Causes of Learner Pronunciation Problems in English
Rothgerber, J. R. (2022) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5682-8.ch072
Kail, M. (2004) · Neurosciences & cognition. Série LMD · doi:10.3917/dbu.ludov.2004.01.0349
(2002) · Odile Jacob eBooks · doi:10.3917/oj.dupou.2002.01.0325
Lee, K. (2023) · Phonetics and Speech Sciences · doi:10.13064/ksss.2023.15.3.037
Tran, T. T. H., Tusnyingyong, S., Vilain, C., Sordes, P., & Gerber, S. (2024) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202419109001
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.index
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.ack
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.toc
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.01ch1
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.prelim
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.refs
4. Nasals and nasalization in Spanish and Portuguese
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.04ch4
(2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9.06ch6
Preference for Distinct Variants in Learning Sound Correspondences During Dialect Acquisition
Yu, X., & Do, Y. (2025) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309241308171
“Contrary to its wide considerations in L2 speech learning, such as in the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM; Best, 1994, 1995; Best et al., 1988) and the Speech Learning Model (SLM; Flege, 1995a, 1995b), the sound similarity factor is relatively understudied in the domain of second dialect…”
Liu, L., Peter, V., Zeng, Z., & Weidemann, G. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.a.76
Cumulative Enhancement in Naïve L3 Tone Perception: The Perception of Pitch and Phonation Type
Niu, Y., & Mok, P. (2026) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309251410913
Interacting with a speaker from a different French region: What is the impact on word recognition?
Brunellière, A., Boddaert, G., Dufour, S., & Knutsen, D. (2026) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0042449
Using offline methods to probe the bi/multilingual acquisition of phonological and phonetic domains
Simonet, M., & Llompart, M. (2026) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal.16.04sim
ABX-discriminability measures and applications
Schatz, T. (2016) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/154e51eczd391z476azbc0fz763e7f763682 · Cited by 30
L’acquisition du voisement des occlusives du français par des sinophones : locuteurs wu et non-wu
Wang, N. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/eb824df4z72dez4391z8da4z5dd5d0de21e8
Issues in L2 phonological processing
Melnik-Leroy, G. A. (2019) · doi:10.70675/9a937142zf04cz4b8ezb9eez721a2a6b9628 · Cited by 3
Yibokou, K. S. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e443ca6eza345z4bedzaaa6zc11617cd3681
Marchand, A. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/7efbeca7z29d4z4ca5zad8bze8d2933d88d9
Modelling non-native speech perception using automatic speech processing
Millet, J. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/86b4843az71c8z41d4za9dcz3db2229b1254
Metadata
- Authors
- Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M.
- ORCID
- Best, Catherine T.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-360
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W4238515972
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- perceptual reorganization, English-speaking adults, infant speech perception, second language acquisition, speech perception development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review