Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 607

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Hollingworth, Andrew, Henderson, John M.·2002·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

The nature of the information retained from previously fixated (and hence attended) objects in natural scenes was investigated. In a saccade-contingent change paradigm, participants successfully detected type and token changes (Experiment 1) or token and rotation changes (Experiment 2) to a target object when the object had been previously attended but was no longer within the focus of attention when the change occurred. In addition, participants demonstrated accurate type-, token-, and orientationdiscrimination performance on subsequent long-term memory tests (Experiments 1 and 2) and during online perceptual processing of a scene (Experiment 3). These data suggest that relatively detailed visual information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. A model of scene perception and long-term memory is proposed. Because of the size and complexity of the visual environments humans tend to inhabit, and because high-acuity vision is limited to a relatively small area of the visual field, detailed perceptual processing of a natural scene depends on the selection of local scene regions by movements of the eyes (for reviews, see Henderson & Hollingworth, 1998, 1999a). During scene viewing, the eyes are reoriented approximately three times each second by saccadic eye movements to bring the projection of a local scene region (typically a discrete object) onto the area of the retina producing the highest acuity vision (the fovea). The periods between saccades, when the eyes are relatively stationary and detailed visual information is encoded, are termed fixations and last an average of approximately 300 ms during scene viewing. During each brief saccadic eye movement, however, visual encoding is suppressed (Matin, 1974). Thus, the visual system is provided with what amounts to a series of snapshots (corresponding to fixations), which may vary dramatically in their visual content over a complex scene, punctuated by brief periods of blindness (corresponding to saccades).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.113

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Cited by

See all 607

Metadata

Authors
Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2002-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
113-136
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2140448023
Cited by
607
References
80
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.113
The paper
Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.