The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism
Open accessAbstract
The spatial interaction of visual attention and saccadic eye movements was investigated in a dual-task paradigm that required a target-directed saccade in combination with a letter discrimination task. Subjects had to saccade to locations within horizontal letter strings left and right of a central fixation cross. The performance in discriminating between the symbols "E" and "E", presented tachistoscopically before the saccade within the surrounding distractors was taken as a measure of visual attention. The data show that visual discrimination is best when discrimination stimulus and saccade target refer to the same object; discrimination at neighboring items is close to chance level. Also, it is not possible, in spite of prior knowledge of discrimination target position, to direct attention to the discrimination target while saccading to a spatially close saccade target. The data strongly argue for an obligatory and selective coupling of saccade programming and visual attention to one common target object. The results favor a model in which a single attentional mechanism selects objects for perceptual processing and recognition, and also provides the information necessary for motor action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670
The role of attention in the programming of saccades
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-u · Cited by 1,302
A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex
Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363345a0 · Cited by 1,114
Cited by
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
Rayner, K. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210902816461 · Cited by 2,682
SPACE AND ATTENTION IN PARIETAL CORTEX
Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.319 · Cited by 1,710
A taxonomy of external and internal attention.
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427 · Cited by 1,472
Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention
Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00084-1 · Cited by 1,390
Metadata
- Authors
- Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1827-1837
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023053047
- Cited by
- 1,979
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4
- The paper
- Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.