Cited by 2,682Reading and Literacy DevelopmentVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search

Rayner, Keith·2009·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

Eye movements are now widely used to investigate cognitive processes during reading, scene perception, and visual search. In this article, research on the following topics is reviewed with respect to reading: (a) the perceptual span (or span of effective vision), (b) preview benefit, (c) eye movement control, and (d) models of eye movements. Related issues with respect to eye movements during scene perception and visual search are also reviewed. It is argued that research on eye movements during reading has been somewhat advanced over research on eye movements in scene perception and visual search and that some of the paradigms developed to study reading should be more widely adopted in the study of scene perception and visual search. Research dealing with “real-world” tasks and research utilizing the visual-world paradigm are also briefly discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470210902816461

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of code review, saccade length is a suitable proxy for the thoroughness of a reviewer's inspection.

    “Consequently, in the context of code review, saccade length is a suitable proxy for the thoroughness of a reviewer's inspection.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rayner, K.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Rayner, Keith
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2009-08
Volume
62
Issue
8
Pages
1457-1506
ISSN
  • 0033-555X (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
OpenAlex
W2011826874
Cited by
2,682
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 218 · 2025: 242 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 198 · 2020: 211 · 2019: 186 · 2018: 183 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 156 · 2015: 134 · 2014: 148 · 2013: 125 · 2012: 92
FWCI
106.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD26765)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
eye movements, reading, scene perception, visual search, perceptual span, preview benefit, oculomotor control, visual world paradigm, attention
MeSH terms
Attention, Eye Movements, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reading, Visual Fields, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review