The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?
Abstract
Does the explicit task-cuing procedure require an endogenous a act of control? In 5 experiments, cues indicating which task to perform preceded targets by several stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). Two models were developed to account for changes in reaction time (RT) with SOA. Model 1 assumed an endogenous act of task switching for cue alterations but not for cue repetitions. Model 2 assumed no such act. In Experiments 1 and 2, the cue was masked or not masked. Masking interacted underadditively with repetition and alternation, consistent with Model 2 but not Model 1. In Experiments 3 and 4, 2 cues were used for each task. RT was slower for task repetition than for cue repetition and about the same as RT for task alternation, consistent with Model 2 but not Model 1. The results suggest that the explicit task-cuing procedure does not require an endogenous act of control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,080
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks.
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207 · Cited by 3,170
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Ross, B. H. (2012) · Cited by 2,632
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.97.3.332 · Cited by 2,139
Handbook of mathematical psychology: I.
Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., & Galanter, E. (1963) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 1,999
Handbook Of Mathematical Psychology
Galanter, & Eugène (1963) · Cited by 1,956
Bundesen, C. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.97.4.523 · Cited by 1,704
Self-citationStochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes
Snodgrass, J. G., Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1985) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422636 · Cited by 1,522
Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3 · Cited by 1,396
Cited by
Monsell, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00028-7 · Cited by 2,984
Control and interference in task switching—A review
Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019842 · Cited by 1,485
The role of inhibition in task switching: A review
Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.17.1.1 · Cited by 493
The Cost of a Voluntary Task Switch
Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00728.x · Cited by 366
Self-citationKim, C., Cilles, S. E., Johnson, N. F., & Gold, B. T. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21199 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 575-599
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2038006674
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
- The paper
- Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
