On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity.

Logan, Gordon D.·1979·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

The concurrent-memory-load technique identifies attention demands with interactions between reaction-time-task parameters and the size of the load on memory. Three experiments are reported in which a multiple-choice, reaction time task involving two, four, and eig-ht stimulus-response (S-R) alternatives was performed alone and in the retention interval of a short-termmemory task involving ordered recall of eight digits. In Experiment 1, assignment of stimulus letters to response buttons (S-R mapping) was consistent for 6 days but varied on the seventh. Memory load and number of alternatives interacted early in practice, but the interaction diminished over days, and the effects were additive on Day 6. When the S-R mapping changed on Day 7, the interaction returned. In Experiment 2, S-R mapping varied daily for 6 days, and the interaction remained stable throughout practice. In Experiment 3, S-R mapping was consistent for 6 days and varied on the seventh, but the memory task was not introduced until Days 6 and 7. The interaction between memory load and number of alternatives was stronger on

Cites (7)

  1. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
    Craik, Fergus I.M., Lockhart, Robert S. · 1972 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
  2. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
    Kirk, Roger · 2013
  3. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory
    Shiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
  4. Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
    Atkinson, R.C., Shiffrin, R.M. · 1968 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
  5. Perception and communication.
    Broadbent, D. E. · 1958
  6. Components of attention
    Posner, Michael I., Boies, Stephen J. · 1971 · Psychological Review
  7. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.
    Hyman, Ray · 1953 · Journal of Experimental Psychology

Show all 7 references

Cited by (17)

  1. Toward an instance theory of automatization.
    Logan, Gordon D. · 1988 · Psychological Review
  2. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory
    Pashler, Harold · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Ironic processes of mental control.
    Wegner, Daniel M. · 1994 · Psychological Review
  4. A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes
    Tiffany, Stephen T. · 1990 · Psychological Review
  5. Interactions between attention and working memory
    Awh, E., Vogel, E.K., Oh, S.-H. · 2006 · Neuroscience

See all 339

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.5.2.189
The paper
Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.5.2.189

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.