The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants.
Open accessAbstract
For many years there has been a consensus that early linguistic experience exerts a profound and often permanent effect on the perceptual abilities underlying the identification and discrimination of stop consonants. It has also been concluded that selective modification of the perception of stop consonants cannot be accomplished easily and quickly in the laboratory with simple discrimination training techniques. In the present article we report the results of three experiments that examined the perception of a three-way voicing contrast by naive monolingual speakers of English. Laboratory training procedures were implemented with a small computer in a real-time environment to examine the perception of voiced, voiceless unaspirated, and voiceless aspirated stops differing in voice onset time. Three perceptual categories were present for most subjects after only a few minutes of exposure to the novel contrast. Subsequent perceptual tests revealed reliable and consistent labeling and categorical-like discrimination functions for all three voicing categories, even though one of the contrasts is not phonologically distinctive in English. The present results demonstrate that the perceptual mechanisms used by adults in categorizing stop consonants can be modified easily with simple laboratory techniques in a short period of time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our work suggests that this is more difficult, but still possible, in the case of nonnative place of articulation distinctions.”
From Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception (1985) · cites this paper as Pisoni, Aslin, Perey, and Hennessy's (1982)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Abramson AS, Lisker L. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 1967. Academia; Prague: 1970. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross language tests. [Google Scholar]
- Ades AE. Vowels, consonants, speech, and nonspeech. Psychological Review. 1977;84:524–530. [Google Scholar]
- Aslin RN, Pisoni DB. Some developmental processes in speech perception. In: Yeai-Komshian G, Kavanagh J, Ferguson CA, editors. Child phonology: Perception and production. Vol. 1. Academic Press; New York: 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Aslin RN, Pisoni DB, Hennessy B, Perey AJ. Discrimination of Voice-onset-time by human infants: New findings concerning phonetic development. Child Development. 1981;52:1135–1145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Attneave F. Applications of information theory to psychology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston; New York: 1959. [Google Scholar]
- Blakemore C. Developmental factors in the formation of feature extracting neurons. In: Schmidt FO, Worden FG, editors. The neurosciences: Third study program. MIT Press; Cambridge, Mass.: 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Caramazza A, Yeni-Komshian GH, Zurif EB, Carbone E. The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1973;54:421–428. doi: 10.1121/1.1913594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Cross DV, Lane HL. On the discriminative control of concurrent responses: The relations among response frequency, latency and topography in auditory generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1962;5:487–496. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Daniels JD, Pettigrew JD. Development of neuronal response in the visual system of cats. In: Gottlieb G, editor. Neural and behavioral specificity: Studies on the development of behavior and the nervous system. Vol. 3. Academic Press; New York: 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Durlach NI, Braida LD. Intensity perception: I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1969;46:372–383. doi: 10.1121/1.1911699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Edman TR, Soli SD, Widin GP. Learning and generalization of intra-phonemic VOT discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1978;63:SI, 19. [Google Scholar]
- Eimas PD. Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech: Discrimination of the [r-1] distinction by young infants. Perception & Psychophysics. 1975;18:341–347. [Google Scholar]
- Eimas PD. Developmental aspects of speech perception. In: Held R, Leibowitz H, Teuber HL, editors. Handbook of sensory physiology: VIII. Perception. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Eimas PD, Tartter VC. On the development of speech perception: Mechanisms and analogies. In: Lipsitt L, Reese H, editors. Advances in child development and behavior. Vol. 13. Academic Press; New York: 1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klatt DH. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1980;67:971–995. [Google Scholar]
- Lane HL. The motor theory of speech perception: A critical review. Psychological Review. 1965;72:275–309. doi: 10.1037/h0021986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Lane HL, Moore DJ. Reconditioning a consonant discrimination in an aphasic: An experimental case history. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1962;27:232–243. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2703.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Lisker L. Status Report on Speech Research (SR-24) Haskins Laboratories; New Haven, Conn: 1970. On learning a new contrast. [Google Scholar]
- Lisker L. Status Report on Speech Research SR-24. Haskins Laboratories; New Haven, Conn: 1970. On learning a new contrast. [Google Scholar]
- Lisker L, Abramson AS. The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences; Prague: Academia; 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Miller JD, Wier CC, Pastore R, Kelly WJ, Dooling RJ. Discrimination and labelling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: An example of categorical perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1916;60:410–417. doi: 10.1121/1.381097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- McClasky CL, Pisoni DB, Carrell TD. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 6. Indiana University; Bloomington: 1980. Effects of transfer of training on identification of a new linguistic contrast in voicing. [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni DB. Status Report on Speech Research SR--27. Haskins Laboratories; New Haven, Conn.: 1971. On the nature of categorical perception of speech sounds. Supplement. [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni DB. Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception. Memory & Cognition. 1975;3:7–18. doi: 10.3758/BF03198202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Pisoni DB. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 3. Indiana University; Bloomington: 1976. Some effects of discrimination training on the identification and discrimination of rapid spectral changes. [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni DB. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1977;67:1352–1361. doi: 10.1121/1.381409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Pisoni DB. Perception of speech vs. nonspeech: Evidence for different modes of processing. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences; Copenhagen: Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen; 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni DB, Lazarus JH. Categorical and non-categorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1974;55:328–333. doi: 10.1121/1.1914506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Pisoni DB, Tash JB. Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics. 1974;15:285–290. doi: 10.3758/bf03213946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- Remez RE. Adaptation of the category boundary between speech and nonspeech: A case against feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology. 1979;11:38–57. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Stevens KN. The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In: David EE Jr., Denes PB, editors. Human communication: A unified view. McGraw-Hill; New York: 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Strange W. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota; 1972. The effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech sounds: Voice onset time. [Google Scholar]
- Strange W, Jenkins JJ. Role of linguistic experience in the perception of speech. In: Walk RD, Pick HL, editors. Perception and experience. Plenum Press; New York: 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Streeter LA. Kikuyu labial and apical stop discrimination. Journal of Phonetics. 1976;4:43–49. a. [Google Scholar]
- Streeter LA, Landauer TK. Effects of learning English as a second language on the acquisition of a new phonemic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1976;59:448–451. doi: 10.1121/1.380864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- Walker HM, Lev J. Statistical inference. Holt; New York: 1953. [Google Scholar]
- Woodworth RS. Experimental psychology. Holt; New York: 1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–108 of 108
Neurophysiologic Correlates and Disorders of Lexical Tones
Wong, P. C. M. (2005) · Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders · doi:10.1044/nnsld15.2.15
Japanese Listeners’ Judgments of Prolongations: With Focus on the Effect of Phonemic Length Contrast
Kang, M., Chung, I., & Park, J. (2020) · Audiology and Speech Research · doi:10.21848/asr.200047
Reinforced statistical learning of auditory categoriesPreprint
McMurray, B., & Chiu, S. L. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rzbfu
Yavas, M. S. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781444392623.refs
(2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.002.0005
(2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.002.0007
(2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.002.0003
Metadata
- Authors
- Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Perey, A. J., & Hennessy, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- ORCID
- Pisoni, David B.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297-314
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- PMC
- PMC3495319
- OpenAlex
- W1993119641
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2006-03-29)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000111-38)
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- voicing contrast, stop consonants, voice onset time, perceptual learning, discrimination training, categorical perception, phonetic categories, English speakers, aspirated stops, voiceless stops
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Phonetics, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
